ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Structure-informed evolutionary analysis of the meiotic recombination machinery.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite being essential for fertility, many proteins involved in meiotic homologous recombination have diverged rapidly. The evolutionary forces driving this divergence remain mostly unknown, in part because of challenges in accounting for the interplay of sequence changes with constraints imposed by proteins' structures and physiological roles. Here, we explore strategies to more sensitively detect signatures of positive or relaxed selection by integrating evolutionary analyses with structural and functional information, using meiotic recombination proteins in four taxa-primates, rodents, birds and budding yeasts. By mapping selection rate estimates onto predicted protein structures, we characterized protein regions likely to have experienced positive selection. We further identified subtle sequence variation within protein domains that are well conserved generally because of structural constraints. To detect sequence variation masked by these constraints, we analyzed selection at structurally matched residues, comparing homologs across different lineages as well as between meiosis-specific and generalist paralogs. These approaches identified lineage- and paralog-restricted enrichment of non-synonymous substitutions that may indicate loss of functional constraints and/or adaptive innovation. Finally, we used cross-species complementation experiments in
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.