ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Antibody feedback establishes an affinity brake in the germinal center.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
42 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in mRNA vaccine technology have opened the door to novel types of antigen display, but little is yet known as to how B cells recognize and respond to these formats. By delivering an mRNA-LNP encoded membrane-bound immunogen displaying three conserved HIV-1 Envelope (Env) epitopes to knock-in mouse models with B cell receptors (BCRs) of defined affinities, we investigated how epitope-specific competition shapes germinal center (GC) responses. Co-activation of B cells targeting different epitopes did not alter GC kinetics observed in individual activations, but a striking inverse correlation was observed between BCR affinity and GC residence time in either scenario: high-affinity B cells exhibited shorter persistence in GCs, while those with lower affinity to the antigen were maintained. Furthermore, B cells were able to engage in GC reactions at equivalent rates in the presence or absence of clonal lineages binding the same epitope with similar affinities, while higher-affinity clones suppressed lower-affinity counterparts targeting the same epitope. Spatial transcriptomics revealed plasma-like cells within and adjacent to the GC which, together with the detection of early IgG in draining lymph nodes, suggests that local antibody production from these cells may contribute to feedback-driven kinetics. These findings indicate that a self-modulated local antibody feedback loop may act as a "brake" on epitope-specific recognition-dampening further affinity enhancement for high-affinity B cells and facilitating epitope spreading by redirecting the response toward alternative epitopes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.