ArticleIndian journal of psychological medicine2025
Initial Insights into ICD-11 Complex PTSD and Emotional Distress in Emerging Adults in India: Prevalence, Predictors, and Psychosocial Correlates.
Article in Indian journal of psychological medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biomarkers for complex post-traumatic stress disorder: translational and evolutionary perspectives.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The increasing emotional distress among emerging adults highlights the importance of examining trauma-related factors, particularly complex trauma. This study investigates post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), complex post-traumatic stress disorder (C-PTSD), and emotional distress, emphasizing the predictive role of disturbances in self-organization (DSO) as defined by the International Classification of Diseases (11th revision) (ICD-11). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 538 college-going emerging adults (aged 15-29 years). The study received ethical clearance from the institute and informed consent from the participants, who completed validated measures: the International Trauma Questionnaire and Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney/Kruskal-Wallis tests, Pearson's correlation, and multiple linear regression. Thematic analysis was used to explore self-reported traumatic experiences. Results: Prevalence rates were 15.2% for C-PTSD, 20.8% for PTSD, 53.9% for depression, 66.5% for anxiety, and 36.2% for stress. DSO showed the strongest associations with all three domains of emotional distress. Thematic analysis revealed multidimensional trauma themes, including career anxiety, relational issues, abuse, loss, and social exclusion. Gender and psychiatric history significantly moderated distress levels, while rural-urban background showed no difference. Conclusions: Among the variables, DSO demonstrated the strongest and most consistent associations with depression, anxiety, and stress, pointing to its close link with complex trauma responses. Results highlight the need for trauma-informed screening and interventions in Indian academic settings and support ICD-11's distinction between PTSD and C-PTSD. A tiered intervention model is recommended for early detection and tailored care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.