Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41292684›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025

Acetate-based syntrophy enhances methane production potential of ruminant feces.

Jian Liu, Yujie Sha, Run Dang, Lifeng Zhou, Meng Zhou, Yang Tan, Jinming Wang, Ge Ran, Wei Xie, Dong Xia and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jian LiuShandong Engineering Research Center of Green and Efficient Breeding and Food Deep Processing of Featured Livestock and Poultry, Institute of Biophysics, Dezhou University, Dezhou, China.
Yujie ShaShandong Engineering Research Center of Green and Efficient Breeding and Food Deep Processing of Featured Livestock and Poultry, Institute of Biophysics, Dezhou University, Dezhou, China.
Run DangCAS Key Laboratory of Coastal Environmental Processes and Ecological Remediation, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai, China.
Lifeng ZhouCAS Key Laboratory of Coastal Environmental Processes and Ecological Remediation, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai, China.
Meng ZhouState Key Laboratory of Black Soils Conservation and Utilization, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin, China.
Yang TanCAS Key Laboratory of Coastal Environmental Processes and Ecological Remediation, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai, China.
Jinming WangSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Yantai University of Science and Technology, Yantai, China.
Ge RanSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Yantai University of Science and Technology, Yantai, China.
Wei XieSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Yantai University of Science and Technology, Yantai, China.
Dong XiaDezhou Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Career Development Center (Dezhou Animal Disease Prevention and Control Center), Dezhou, China.
Luotong WangInternational Joint Laboratory of Agricultural Food Science and Technology of Universities of Shandong, Dezhou University, Dezhou, China.
Xingtang ZhaoShandong Engineering Research Center of Green and Efficient Breeding and Food Deep Processing of Featured Livestock and Poultry, Institute of Biophysics, Dezhou University, Dezhou, China.
Bok-Min GoiLee Kong Chian Faculty of Engineering & Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR), Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Jiafeng YuShandong Engineering Research Center of Green and Efficient Breeding and Food Deep Processing of Featured Livestock and Poultry, Institute of Biophysics, Dezhou University, Dezhou, China.
Leilei XiaoCAS Key Laboratory of Coastal Environmental Processes and Ecological Remediation, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Livestock feces contribute to approximately 32% of global methane emissions. Although ruminants are generally believed to have a higher methane production potential than non-ruminants, the dominant pathways and key regulatory processes underlying methane generation in ruminants remain poorly understood, impeding effective manure management and accurate livestock emission assessments. In this study, metagenomic and carbon isotope techniques were employed to investigate methane production potential and key pathways in sheep, pig, chicken, and duck feces. Methane production potential of ruminant sheep feces was significantly higher (approximately threefold) compared to that of non-ruminants. Isotopic analysis of methane sources revealed that sheep feces primarily produce methane through the acetoclastic pathway, whereas the other three likely rely on CO

Indexed as

acetoclastic pathwayfecesisotope tracingmetagenomemethanogenesis

Identifiers

PMID41292684
PMCPMC12643385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.