ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Dynamic Risk Trajectories for Sudden Cardiac Arrest: The Role of Recurrent Cardiovascular Events.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Emerging evidence suggests that dynamic risk assessment may enhance sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) risk stratification. While cardiovascular events, including acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and heart failure (HF) hospitalization, are associated with increased SCA risk, the impact of recurrent events on subsequent SCA risk in a contemporary, real-world population is unknown. This study aimed to assess whether patients with a first-time ACS or HF hospitalization who experience a recurrent cardiovascular event have higher risk of SCA compared to those who do not. Methods: The Observational Study of Cardiac Arrest Risk (OSCAR) is a prospective cohort study with adjudicated SCA outcomes. In the current study, patients who survived a first ACS or HF hospitalization were categorized into index ACS or HF cohorts. Participants were followed for recurrent cardiovascular events and SCA. Associations between recurrent events and SCA were assessed using Cox models with recurrent event modeled as a time-dependent variable. Findings were validated in the Framingham Heart Study (FHS). Results: In the OSCAR discovery cohort, 2946 patients experienced an index ACS event. The incidence rate of SCA was higher following a recurrent ACS event than without (3.70 vs 1.28 per 100 patient-years). Recurrent ACS event was associated with a significantly higher risk of SCA (adjusted HR 3.15, 95% CI 2.06-4.83, p<0.0001). A total of 6711 patients experienced an index HF hospitalization, and the incidence rate of SCA was higher following a recurrent HF event than without (1.35 vs 0.97 per 100 patient-years). Recurrent HF hospitalization was associated with a significantly higher risk of SCA (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.46-2.26, p<0.0001).In the FHS validation cohorts a recurrent event during follow-up was associated with a significantly higher risk of SCA in the ACS cohort (HR 2.85, 95% CI 1.66-4.90, p=0.0002), but the association was not statistically significant in the HF cohort (HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.73-3.03, p=0.27). Conclusion: Recurrent ACS event was associated with more than threefold higher risk of SCA, and a recurrent HF hospitalization with 80% higher risk of SCA. These findings suggest that dynamic clinical trajectories of recurrent cardiovascular events may inform management and prevention of SCA.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.