Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41292612›Full record

ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025

Flushing away disease: A one health perspective on sanitation, pathogen transmission, and rural health in China.

Shilong Zhao, Junqiao Ma, Wenjing Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shilong ZhaoCollege of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, PR China.
Junqiao MaCollege of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, PR China.
Wenjing LiCollege of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improved sanitation is a cornerstone public health intervention, fundamentally integrating human, animal, and environmental health. China's Toilet Revolution marked a nationwide initiative to upgrade rural sanitation, yet evidence on its integrated health effects remains scare. Drawing on provincial panel data and China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS), this study applies two-way fixed effect and staggered Difference-in Differences (DID) from a one health perspective to assess the reform's impacts. Our results indicate that the expansion of sanitary toilets significantly disrupted environmental pathogen transmission, reducing the incidence of fecal-oral diseases such as bacillary dysentery and infectious diarrhea. The reform also lowered risks of zoonotic infections-including brucellosis, echinococcosis, and leptospirosis-by interrupting pathogen cycles between humans, animals, and the environment. At the household level, this reform generated substantial health benefits. Specifically, the probability of illness fell by 6.7 % in the past four weeks, and healthcare expenditure declined by 17.7 %. However, these benefits were not distributed equitably, with men and higher-income households benefiting more than women and lower-income groups. Collectively, this study demonstrates that while rural sanitation upgrades are a powerful one health intervention, their health benefits are maximized and sustained only through equitable and cross-sectoral collaboration.

Indexed as

DiseaseHealth impactOne healthSanitation infrastructuresToilet revolution

Identifiers

PMID41292612
PMCPMC12642125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.