ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025
Flushing away disease: A one health perspective on sanitation, pathogen transmission, and rural health in China.
Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A data-driven approach for mitigation of fecal pathogen infections from unsafe WASH practices.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improved sanitation is a cornerstone public health intervention, fundamentally integrating human, animal, and environmental health. China's Toilet Revolution marked a nationwide initiative to upgrade rural sanitation, yet evidence on its integrated health effects remains scare. Drawing on provincial panel data and China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS), this study applies two-way fixed effect and staggered Difference-in Differences (DID) from a one health perspective to assess the reform's impacts. Our results indicate that the expansion of sanitary toilets significantly disrupted environmental pathogen transmission, reducing the incidence of fecal-oral diseases such as bacillary dysentery and infectious diarrhea. The reform also lowered risks of zoonotic infections-including brucellosis, echinococcosis, and leptospirosis-by interrupting pathogen cycles between humans, animals, and the environment. At the household level, this reform generated substantial health benefits. Specifically, the probability of illness fell by 6.7 % in the past four weeks, and healthcare expenditure declined by 17.7 %. However, these benefits were not distributed equitably, with men and higher-income households benefiting more than women and lower-income groups. Collectively, this study demonstrates that while rural sanitation upgrades are a powerful one health intervention, their health benefits are maximized and sustained only through equitable and cross-sectoral collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.