ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2025
"
Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Since the 1990s, the relocation of psychiatric patients from long-stay institutions to community-based supported living has increased globally. However, most evidence on suitable residential services comes from high-income countries, with little from low- and middle-income contexts. This study explored the experiences of residents and carers in three residential care homes for people living with serious mental illness in Sedibeng District, South Africa. Methods: Three organisations were purposefully selected as in-depth case studies. Ninety-one face-to-face qualitative interviews were conducted with service providers, residents, and family members between October 2022 and June 2023. Findings: Residents described severe psychosocial disability when living with families, but improved functioning in residential homes. Organisations 1 and 3 operated small 3-4-roomed houses in township areas, accommodating 21 and 40 residents respectively, who had community access and social interaction. In Organisation 3, residents formed romantic relationships, undertook paid work, and lived semi-independently. Organisation 2, a repurposed school-like building with four large dormitories for 86 residents, imposed strict movement controls; medication was used to manage behaviour, and caregivers reported safety concerns. Conclusions: Smaller residential homes offer more autonomy and integration than large dormitory-style facilities. Policies and funding should support smaller, community-based supported accommodation for people with serious mental illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.