ReviewGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2025
Management of postnatal depression: A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines.
Review in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Child health problems and social determinants as predictors of postpartum depression: a cross-sectional study using 2023 Indonesia Health Survey data.Osong public health and research perspectives · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postnatal depression (PND) is the most prevalent mental health disorder during the postpartum period. Evidence suggests that clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can improve the mental well-being of women affected by PND. This study aimed to identify the CPGs available globally for the management of PND and to summarize their recommendations. A comprehensive search was performed across five electronic databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, TRIP, and Epistemonikos) and four guideline-specific websites (GIN, SIGN, NICE, and WHO) to identify the English language CPGs published between 2012 and 2023. The general characteristics of the CPGs, as well as the reported pharmacological and non-pharmacological recommendations, were extracted. The AGREE-II instrument was used to assess the methodological quality. Nineteen CPGs were included in the review, with only one from a low and middle-income country (Lebanon). Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) was the most frequently recommended psychological therapy. Pharmacological interventions were included by 17 CPGs, predominantly Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs). Only three CPGs incorporated Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) in the form of an advisory group. Seven CPGs matched the criteria for adequate methodological quality by achieving an overall score of ≥70%. The findings highlight limited methodological quality and underrepresentation of LMICs, which may lead to disparities in the management of PND and undermine equitable mental health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.