Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41292598›Full record

ReviewGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2025

Mental health of handloom weavers in Bangladesh: A call for culturally adapted interventions.

Md Ashiquir Rahaman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Md Ashiquir RahamanDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Dhaka University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5301-3819

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bangladesh's handloom weaving industry, a vital cultural and economic asset, employs approximately one million rural workers and generates over 10 billion Bangladeshi taka (~82 million USD) annually. Despite its importance, the mental health of handloom weavers, locally known as Tatis, remains largely unexamined. This perspective article, based on a narrative review of existing literature synthesizing peer-reviewed studies, reports and policy documents on mental health in informal sectors, explores the mental health challenges faced by these workers. Using a syndemics framework, it draws on data on garment workers and the broader informal sector, which indicates heightened risks of stress, anxiety and depression resulting from long working hours, low wages and competition from mechanized looms. These risks are compounded by systemic barriers, including Bangladesh's allocation of only 0.44% of its health budget to mental health (2021), a severe shortage of professionals (0.16 psychiatrists per 100,000 people and 0.34 psychologist per 100,000 people) and pervasive cultural stigma. Additionally, musculoskeletal pain, which affects 82.4% of weavers, places a particularly heavy burden on women, who constitute half of the workforce, further exacerbating mental health vulnerabilities through syndemic interactions with poverty and gender inequities. To address this neglected crisis, the article proposes a novel intervention framework aligned with the Double Diamond design model. The framework integrates community-based mental health hubs, peer-led support networks and digital platforms tailored to Bangladesh's collectivist culture. It calls for increased funding, workplace reforms, stigma reduction campaigns and targeted research, highlighting the dual benefit of improving weavers' well-being and sustaining the long-term future of the industry.

Indexed as

Bangladeshhandloom weavershealthcare accessmental healthoccupational stress

Identifiers

PMID41292598
PMCPMC12641311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.