ArticleHealth science reports2025
Improving Sepsis Mortality Prediction With Machine Learning Using Full Region Synthetic Sampling Approach.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improving Sepsis Mortality Prediction With Machine Learning Using Full Region Synthetic Sampling Approach.Health science reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition and remains a leading cause of mortality in Intensive Care Units (ICUs). Accurate mortality prediction is crucial for optimizing ICU resource allocation. However, severe class imbalance in ICU datasets hampers the generalization performance of machine learning models. Methods: This study proposes a Full Region Synthetic Sampling Approach (FRSSA), a novel data augmentation method that dynamically balances the minority class distribution based on regional density. Additionally, we introduce Adaptive Synthetic Sampling Tuning (ASST), an optimization-based strategy that adjusts augmentation weights to enhance model performance. To evaluate model fairness and clinical utility, we propose the Balanced Performance Score (BPS), which integrates accuracy, precision, and recall for personalized ICU risk assessment. Also, we compare two augmentation strategies: (1) Pre-Splitting: Augmentation occurs before data set splitting, and (2) Post-Splitting: Augmentation is applied only to the training set to ensure fair evaluation. We utilize publicly available ICU datasets from both the MIMIC-IV and eICU-CRD databases and evaluate the performance of Random Forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM models, with hyperparameters optimized using RandomizedSearchCV on the training set. Results: The Pre-Splitting strategy achieved 89.64% accuracy and an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) of 0.968, but posed a risk of test-set contamination. In contrast, the Post-Splitting strategy yielded 78.31% accuracy and an AUROC of 0.7241, ensuring better real-world generalization. The ASST mechanism optimally balanced 65% interpolation (FRSSA) and 35% expansion (FRSSA), reducing false positive rates and enhancing model fairness. Conclusion: FRSSA preserves regional data distribution by generating synthetic samples near the imbalanced regions. ASST dynamically adjusts augmentation ratios to maximize classification performance and generalization. The BPS score-fusion metric offers a flexible evaluation framework, accommodating varying clinical priorities in ICU settings. Our findings demonstrate that Post-Splitting augmentation with FRSSA and ASST produces a fairer and more reliable ICU mortality prediction model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.