Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41292557›Full record

ArticleLandscape ecology2025

"The landscape of love": sex-specific habitat-use during the mating season in a solitary large carnivore.

Alejandra Zarzo-Arias, Rick W Heeres, Anne G Hertel, Martin Leclerc, Shane Frank, Sam M J G Steyaert, Jonas Kindberg, Jon E Swenson, Vincenzo Penteriani, Fanie Pelletier and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Landscape ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alejandra Zarzo-AriasDepartment of Biology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5496-0144
Rick W HeeresDepartment of Natural Sciences and Environmental Health, University of South-Eastern Norway, Bø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2746-4940
Anne G HertelDepartment of Biology, Behavioural Ecology, Ludwig-Maximilian University of Munich, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7952-8243
Martin LeclercDépartement des Sciences Fondamentales & Centre d'étude de la Forêt, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, QC Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4429-697X
Shane FrankDepartment of Natural Sciences and Environmental Health, University of South-Eastern Norway, Bø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8153-6656
Sam M J G SteyaertTerrestrial Ecology Group, Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, Nord University, Steinkjer, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6564-6361
Jonas KindbergNorwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1445-4524
Jon E SwensonFaculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5463-4282
Vincenzo PenterianiDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology, National Museum of Natural Sciences, Spanish National Research Council, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9333-7846
Fanie PelletierDépartement de Biologie, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0113-5412
Andreas ZedrosserDepartment of Natural Sciences and Environmental Health, University of South-Eastern Norway, Bø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4417-3037

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: In mammals, reproductive strategies and movement behavior can differ between sexes, influenced by biological and environmental factors. Whereas males typically adopt a "roam-to-mate" strategy, increasing movement to locate females, females may also adjust their behavior to enhance mating opportunities. Habitat and human disturbance can further shape the spatial structure of mating encounters. Objectives: This study investigates sex-specific habitat use during mating in brown bears. We test (1) which habitats facilitate initial male-female encounters, and (2) how habitat use differs between solitary and consorting individuals, focusing on sex-based differences and responses to anthropogenic features. Methods: We used GPS data from 70 unique adult brown bears (44 females, 26 males) during the mating season in Sweden (2006-2016). We contrasted initial encounter areas of male-female pairs with surrounding available habitat to assess encounter site preferences, accounting for natural and anthropogenic landscape features. Additionally, we compared habitat use for each sex when solitary versus consorting. Results: Bears most often encountered the opposite sex in clearcuts and young forests. When consorting, males moved farther away from anthropogenic areas than when solitary and increased their use of clearcuts, whereas females reduced their use of young and old forests, in contrast to males. Both sexes approached roads more when consorting. Conclusion: This study revealed distinct sex-specific habitat preferences during brown bear consorting behavior, supporting the evidence of female "roam-to-mate" behavior by adjusting to males' habitat use. Our findings emphasize the importance of managing anthropogenic landscapes for conservation efforts, especially if they disrupt mating behaviors. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10980-025-02250-6.

Indexed as

Brown bearMovement behaviorReproductionResource selectionSocial behaviorUrsus arctos

Identifiers

PMID41292557
PMCPMC12642813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.