Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41292540›Full record

ArticleJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene2025

High prevalence and associated factors of

Dung LE Kieu, Minh Manh To, VAN Nghiem Dang, VAN Thuan Hoang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dung LE KieuThai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hung Yen, Vietnam.
Minh Manh ToThai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hung Yen, Vietnam.
VAN Nghiem DangThai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hung Yen, Vietnam.
VAN Thuan HoangThai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hung Yen, Vietnam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the prevalence of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection and association with age and gender among children aged from 2 to 59 months, hospitalized with atypical pneumonia in Vietnam from June 2023 to May 2024. Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was performed using data collected from the electronic medical records. M. pneumoniae infection was determined by the IgM serology test. Results: 1,296 patients aged from 2 to 59 months hospitalized with atypical pneumonia were included. The majority of patients were aged 12 months or older, with only 3.6% of cases being under 12 months of age. Male patients accounted for 58.7% of the cases. Prevalence of M. pneumoniae infection was 47.3%. Compared to children under 12 months of age, those aged 12 to under 36 months had a 10 times higher risk of M. pneumoniae infection, with OR = 9.44, 95% CI = [2.90-30.77]. Compared to children under 12 months of age, those aged 36 months to under 5 years had a 20 times higher risk of M. pneumoniae infection, with OR = 20.19, 95% CI = [6.20-65.69]. Compared to female children, male children had nearly twice the lower risk of M. pneumoniae infection, with OR = 0.62, 95% CI = [0.50-0.78]. Conclusion: Our study provides additional evidence on the role of M. pneumoniae in atypical pneumonia in children aged from 2 to 59 months, while also highlighting significant risk factors for M. pneumoniae infection.

Indexed as

Pneumonia, MycoplasmaAge FactorsChild, PreschoolFemaleHospitalizationHospitals, PediatricHumansInfantMaleMycoplasma pneumoniaePrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSex FactorsVietnamAtypical pneumoniaM. pneumoniaeRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID41292540
PMCPMC12643075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.