ArticleMediators of inflammation2025
Clinical Use of Nomogram Based on Machine Learning for Diagnosis Prediction of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Patients With Acute Pancreatitis.
Article in Mediators of inflammation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Clinical Data-Based Nomogram Prediction Model for ARDS in Patients With Acute Pancreatitis.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study focused on utilizing machine learning techniques to construct a predictive nomograph for early identification of acute pancreatitis (AP) patients at risk of developing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 427 AP patients from Tongji Hospital (2010-2021) and externally validated the model using the MIMIC-IV database. Six machine learning algorithms were compared, with the support vector machine (SVM) selected for nomogram construction. Key predictors included age, sex, SOFA score, C-reactive protein (CRP), platelet count (PLT), total bilirubin (TBIL), and direct bilirubin (DBIL). Model performance was assessed via area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The SVM model exhibited the best performance among six machine-learning models assessed. Key predictors including age, sex, SOFA, CRP, PLT, TBIL, and DBIL levels were incorporated into the nomogram. The nomogram demonstrated good discriminatory ability and clinical applicability, with a C-index of 0.818 in the training cohort and 0.799 in the testing cohort. External validation using the MIMIC IV database further confirmed its accuracy, with a C-index of 0.759. Notably, calibration curves showed excellent agreement between predicted and observed outcomes, and DCA indicated a favorable net benefit, reinforcing the model's reliability. Conclusions: The prediction nomogram constructed based on the SVM model in this study can effectively predict the probability of AP complicated by ARDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.