Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41292112›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2025

Bridging peer support and primary care in youth mental health: stakeholder perspectives on needs, key elements and integration challenges.

Rianne Pellemans-van Rooijen, Mark Spigt, Floor P M Koonings, Tom Odink, Verena G Noort, Thérèse A M J van Amelsvoort, Sophie M J Leijdesdorff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rianne Pellemans-van RooijenDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5000-3662
Mark SpigtDepartment of Family Medicine, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Floor P M KooningsDepartment of Family Medicine, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Tom OdinkDepartment of Family Medicine, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Verena G NoortDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Thérèse A M J van AmelsvoortDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Sophie M J LeijdesdorffDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study explored how youth with mental health issues, peer support workers, and primary care professionals perceive youth's needs while receiving support, key elements of peer support, and its integration into primary healthcare.

methodTwenty-eight semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed thematically to identify youth's needs, core components of peer support, and collaboration challenges between peer support services and primary care.

resultsAll stakeholder groups recognized peer support as a valuable, low-threshold complement to traditional care, particularly for those awaiting treatment or lacking social support. Youth emphasized needs for knowledge, destigmatization, validation and connection - needs specifically addressed by the informal, empathetic, and non-hierarchical nature of peer support. Peer support workers and professionals emphasized the need to balance authenticity with safety and professional boundaries. Effective integration requires structured referral pathways, clear communication channels, confidentiality safeguards, and role clarity. Divergent expectations around responsibility for information sharing and formal requirements on lived experience highlight areas for improvement. Flexible peer support options that match youth's changing needs were seen as essential. DISCUSSION: While peer support services offer a valuable addition to youth mental healthcare, its integration with primary care remains complex and requires improved communication, role clarification, and adaptable support options.

Indexed as

Health Services Needs and DemandMental DisordersMental HealthMental Health ServicesPeer GroupPrimary Health CareSocial SupportAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchStakeholder ParticipationYoung Adultlived experiencePeer supportprimary healthcare integrationyouth mental health

Identifiers

PMID41292112
PMCPMC12667305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.