ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2026
Incidents of sudden death during restraint of agitated individuals in Sweden between 1992 and 2024.
Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Restraint-related sudden deaths in agitated individuals raise complex questions at the intersection of medicine and law. Hyperactive delirium with extreme agitation as well as positional asphyxia due to restraint have been proposed to account for these deaths. However, the exact physiological mechanisms responsible and to what extent restraint contributes to the lethal outcome remain debated. In this nationwide, 32-year retrospective study between 1992 and 2024, we examined circumstances surrounding sudden deaths during restraint of agitated individuals in Sweden. A total of 52 cases were identified, with an average of 0.17 deaths per million inhabitants annually. Ninety percent of cases involved prone restraint and 69% showed evidence of stimulant use. In 15 cases from 2005 onward, peri-arrest arterial blood gas data revealed profound metabolic and respiratory acidosis, with a mean blood pH of 6.52 (range: 6.30-6.95; median: 6.50), mean lactate concentration of 26.3 mmol/L (range: 8.6-41.0; median: 30), and mean pCO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.