ArticleActa neuropathologica communications2025
Recurrent genetic alterations in epigenetically defined pineoblastoma subtypes.
Article in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Updates on diagnostic and prognostic molecular biomarkers of CNS tumors".Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Review
- Case study of monozygotic triplets with identical pineal cysts. Is pineal cyst hereditary condition?Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Article
- Genetic landscape and molecular targets in pediatric pineal tumors.Neuro-oncology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous studies have revealed four distinct epigenetic consensus pineoblastoma (PB) subtypes. The aim of this study was to confirm and further extend their respective genetic underpinnings. Cytogenetics of 83 PB were analyzed by high-resolution genome-wide molecular inversion probe analysis and methylation profiling. Seventy-nine cases were screened for mutations by next-generation DNA panel sequencing and for 25 samples mRNA expression was analyzed using NanoString. Additionally, 24 further pineal parenchymal tumors were analyzed. Clinical data of 63 patients was available. Our cohort consisted of 48 PB-miRNA1, 19 PB-miRNA2, 8 PB-MYC/FOXR2, and 8 PB-RB1 cases. PB-miRNA subtype tumors had characteristic alterations in microRNA-processing genes; DICER1 mutations (n = 19/64) and homozygous deletions of the DROSHA locus (n = 18/67) were most abundant, followed by DROSHA mutations (n = 12/64). Most frequent cytogenetic aberrations in PB-miRNA cases were chromosome 7 gains (n = 31/67) and chromosome 14 losses (n = 26/67, including 5 cases with copy-neutral LOH). The latter were significantly associated with DICER1 mutations (p < 0.001). OTX2 gain represented the most frequent alteration that occurred in 37/83 PB of all subtypes. In the PB-miRNA subtypes we identified cases with polyploid cytogenetics (n = 16/67). In contrast to previous publications, we did not find a difference in survival for the PB-miRNA subtypes, whereas PB-MYC/FOXR2 and PB-RB1 in infants showed a worse outcome. Epigenetically defined PB subtypes are characterized by distinct genetic events. Frequent gains of the oncogene OTX2 indicate a role in the pathogenesis of PB independent of its subtype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.