Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41291952›Full record

ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2025

A drug-drug interaction study to evaluate the effects of strong CYP3A4 inducer on the pharmacokinetics of segesterone acetate and ethinyl estradiol in a contraceptive vaginal system.

Marlena Plagianos, Maud Lansiaux, Narender Kumar, Shelli Graham, Heather Sussman, Harvey Kushner, George Creasy, Brian Bernick, Lisa B Haddad

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04290390 (A Drug-Drug Interaction Study to Evaluate the Effects of Strong CYP3A Induction and Inhibition on the Pharmacokinetics of Segesterone Acetate and Ethinyl Estradiol From the Annovera™ Contraceptive Vaginal System), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04290390 phase1completednot on this map

A Drug-Drug Interaction Study to Evaluate the Effects of Strong CYP3A Induction and Inhibition on the Pharmacokinetics of Segesterone Acetate and Ethinyl Estradiol From the Annovera™ Contraceptive Vaginal System

TypeinterventionalSponsorTherapeuticsMDRan2020 to 2021Enrolled67ConditionsWomen, ContraceptionArmsSegesterone Acetate and Ethinyl Estradiol, Rifampin, Itraconazole
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marlena PlagianosPopulation Council, 1230 York Ave, New York, NY, USA. mplagianos@popcouncil.org.
Maud LansiauxPopulation Council, 1230 York Ave, New York, NY, USA.
Narender KumarPopulation Council, 1230 York Ave, New York, NY, USA.
Shelli GrahamPleoPharma, Phoenixville, USA.
Heather SussmanPopulation Council, 1230 York Ave, New York, NY, USA.
Harvey KushnerBioMedical Computer Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
George CreasyPopulation Council, 1230 York Ave, New York, NY, USA.
Brian BernickTherpeuticsMD, Boca Raton, USA.
Lisa B HaddadPopulation Council, 1230 York Ave, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2018, the US FDA approved a long-acting contraceptive vaginal system (CVS) releasing a new progestin, segesterone acetate (SA) and ethinyl estradiol (EE). As most progestins and EE used in hormonal contraceptives are metabolized via the CYP3A4 pathway, drug-drug interactions within the CYP3A4 network are a potential concern for contraceptive efficacy and/or safety. SA and EE systemic exposure could be reduced following administration of a strong CYP3A4 inducer such as rifampin, thus influencing risk of pregnancy or side effects. The study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetics of SA and EE from the CVS in healthy women when co-administered with rifampin. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis randomized, open-label, cross-over study was conducted at two Canadian sites to evaluate potential drug-drug interaction between rifampin (600 mg once daily) and the CVS releasing on average 150 µg of SA and 13 µg of EE daily. Blood samples were collected at predetermined time intervals after CVS insertion with and without concomitant Rifampin treatment. Serum concentrations of SA and EE were measured by validated LCMS/MS method. Concentrations were used to calculate pharmacokinetic parameters for comparison.

resultsTwenty-one healthy women were enrolled and randomized (1:1) to sequence A (CVS alone in treatment cycle 1; CVS + rifampin in treatment cycle 2) or sequence B (CVS + rifampin in treatment cycle 1; CVS alone in treatment cycle 2); 18 women completed the study. Rifampin co-treatment had no significant impact on PK parameters of SA. The 90% confidence intervals of geometric mean ratios (GMR) for AUC and Cmax were wholly contained within 0.8–1.25, supportive of bioequivalence. Serum concentrations of EE were significantly decreased: the GMR and 90% confidence intervals for AUC were 0.44 (0.39–0.50) and Cmax was 0.55 (0.47–0.65). No new or unexpected safety concerns were observed during the study conduct.

conclusionsWe report a drug-drug interaction of rifampin on systemic exposure of EE but not SA. As the progestin seems to be the major driver of contraceptive efficacy, we do not expect co-administration of a CYP3A4 inducer to reduce contraceptive effectiveness. These results suggest that this CVS may be used with rifampin without additional precautions to prevent unintended pregnancy.

trial registrationThis trial was registered with ClincalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04290390.

Indexed as

Contraceptive vaginal systemDrug–drug interactionEthinyl-estradiolPharmacokineticsRifampinSegesterone acetate

Identifiers

PMID41291952
PMCPMC12751760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.