ArticleJournal of eating disorders2025
Clinician knowledge and perceptions of evidence-based practice in pediatric eating disorders in Western Canada.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEvidence-based practice (EBP) for pediatric eating disorders (EDs), including the strongly recommended family-based treatment (FBT), is not always available to children, adolescents or emerging adults and their families. Our aim was to investigate clinician knowledge and perspectives of EBP, including FBT, and explore barriers and facilitators to its implementation.
methodsClinicians working in Western Canada who were engaged in care for pediatric EDs were invited to participate. A multimethod design was employed using an online survey and subsequent phone interview for data collection. Descriptive data was summarized using means and frequencies. Qualitative data was analysed using a mixed approach encompassing inductive and deductive techniques.
resultsEighty-four clinicians completed the survey and 24 completed the interview. A total of 64% of clinicians providing therapy were offering FBT in their practice. Of these, 12.5% had no formal training in the modality. Clinicians identified a range of barriers and facilitators to EBP, including FBT, such as service-centered reasons (inadequate training, staff beliefs around which professionals should be involved, program mandates, and private practice therapists struggling to get other professionals on the 'same page' in FBT), clinician-centered reasons (desire to offer more holistic care, lack of inclusion of dietetics, belief that FBT was better suited to hospital settings), and patient/family-centered reasons (co-occurring conditions in parents or children, lack of financial privilege).
conclusionsThe barriers to delivering EBP, and low rates of formal FBT training indicate a need to improve capacity building efforts for pediatric ED clinicians, including improved access to training and consultation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.