Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41291908›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2025

Assessing the implementation of infection prevention and control measures at private hospitals in Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Ahmed Mohamed Elhag, Yasir Ahmed Mohammed Elhadi, Iffat Elbarazi, Rami H Al-Rifai, Abubaker Suliman, Emad Masuadi, Yauhen Statsenko, Mohammed Khogali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ahmed Mohamed ElhagInstitute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Tawam street, 15551, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Yasir Ahmed Mohammed ElhadiInstitute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Tawam street, 15551, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Iffat ElbaraziInstitute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Tawam street, 15551, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Rami H Al-RifaiInstitute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Tawam street, 15551, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Abubaker SulimanInstitute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Tawam street, 15551, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Emad MasuadiInstitute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Tawam street, 15551, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Yauhen StatsenkoDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, 15551, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Mohammed KhogaliInstitute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Tawam street, 15551, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates. Ahmedm@uaeu.ac.ae.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementation of rigorous and effective infection prevention and control (IPC) measures is one of the pillars of preventing health care associated infections, reducing inappropriate use of antimicrobials, and combating antimicrobial resistance. Dubai Health Authority has long been implementing IPC programs in Dubai's health facilities. This study aimed to assess the level of IPC implementation in private hospitals in Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

methodsThis was a hospital based cross-sectional study, using primary data collected between May and July 2023. Data were collected using the World Health Organization's Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF).

resultsOf the 32 hospitals invited to participate in the study, 25 (78%) completed the survey. The overall IPCAF median score of participating hospitals was 752.5 (IQR: 710-760), which corresponds to an advanced level of IPC implementation. No statistically significant difference was observed either in median scores between hospital levels of care (P value = 0.2) or across hospitals with different bed capacity (P value = 0.6). All IPC components achieved high IPCAF scores, with core component 2 (IPC guidelines) and core component 6 (Monitoring and Feedback) having the highest (100) and the lowest (80) median scores, respectively. Notable variation observed within and between components. Despite high overall scores, several gaps were observed, particularly in implementing multimodal strategy, monitoring and assessing safety culture, institutionalizing leadership-driven staff empowerment in certain hospitals.

conclusionThe study indicated a strong overall IPC implementation in Dubai's private hospitals. However, targeted interventions such as standardized and continuous training, regular hand hygiene audits with feedback, improved surveillance, and expanded antimicrobial stewardship capacity are needed in specific areas to ensure effective and consistent implementation of the core components across all hospitals.

Indexed as

Cross InfectionHospitals, PrivateInfection ControlCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Arab EmiratesAMRHealthcare-associated infectionIPCIPCAFUAE

Identifiers

PMID41291908
PMCPMC12751700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.