ReviewEuropean journal of medical research2025
"Tailored" vs. "one-size-fits-all": current knowledge of individualized PEEP and constant PEEP strategy during the perioperative period.
Review in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are dramatically associated with prolonged hospitalization and increased mortality rates in surgical patients. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), a standardized lung-protective strategy, has been proven to effectively improve perioperative oxygenation and pulmonary compliance. However, constant high PEEP may induce alveolar hyperventilation and elevate pulmonary vascular resistance, while fixed low PEEP may not prevent atelectasis and even cause PPCs. Currently, an individualized PEEP (iPEEP) approach is found to be superior to the constant PEEP strategy during surgery. This review highlights that iPEEP reduces PPCs, decreases the risk of atelectasis, improves arterial oxygenation, prevents end-expiratory lung collapse, and reduces ventilator-induced lung injury during gastrointestinal, urologic, cardiac, abdominal, and other surgeries under general anesthesia. Besides, iPEEP can also attenuate local lung inflammatory responses, counterbalance intraabdominal pressure, improve postoperative cognitive function, elevate cardiopulmonary exercise capacity, and reduce hospitalization time. Therefore, it is recommended to apply iPEEP against a constant low or high PEEP strategy during surgery under general anesthesia. Further studies are still warranted to define the best ventilation setting and reach a consensus on the ventilatory management of surgical patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.