Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41291899›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of medical research2025

"Tailored" vs. "one-size-fits-all": current knowledge of individualized PEEP and constant PEEP strategy during the perioperative period.

Linfeng Wu, Jian Liao, Xiaoting Zhang, Xiaoyao Li, Xuezheng Lin, Zhencang Zheng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Linfeng WuDepartment of Anesthesia Surgery, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, China.
Jian LiaoDepartment of Nephrology, Jiaxing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiaxing, China.
Xiaoting ZhangDepartment of Anesthesia Surgery, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, China.
Xiaoyao LiDepartment of Anesthesia Surgery, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, China.
Xuezheng LinDepartment of Anesthesia Surgery, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, China.
Zhencang ZhengTaizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, Zhejiang, China. zhencangzheng@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8706-0062

Funding

The study was supported by the Zhejiang Medical and Health Science and Technology Program. 2024KY1819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are dramatically associated with prolonged hospitalization and increased mortality rates in surgical patients. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), a standardized lung-protective strategy, has been proven to effectively improve perioperative oxygenation and pulmonary compliance. However, constant high PEEP may induce alveolar hyperventilation and elevate pulmonary vascular resistance, while fixed low PEEP may not prevent atelectasis and even cause PPCs. Currently, an individualized PEEP (iPEEP) approach is found to be superior to the constant PEEP strategy during surgery. This review highlights that iPEEP reduces PPCs, decreases the risk of atelectasis, improves arterial oxygenation, prevents end-expiratory lung collapse, and reduces ventilator-induced lung injury during gastrointestinal, urologic, cardiac, abdominal, and other surgeries under general anesthesia. Besides, iPEEP can also attenuate local lung inflammatory responses, counterbalance intraabdominal pressure, improve postoperative cognitive function, elevate cardiopulmonary exercise capacity, and reduce hospitalization time. Therefore, it is recommended to apply iPEEP against a constant low or high PEEP strategy during surgery under general anesthesia. Further studies are still warranted to define the best ventilation setting and reach a consensus on the ventilatory management of surgical patients.

Indexed as

Positive-Pressure RespirationPostoperative ComplicationsHumansPerioperative PeriodIndividualized PEEPPostoperative pulmonary complicationsSurgeryVentilator-induced lung injury

Identifiers

PMID41291899
PMCPMC12645739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.