Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41291888›Full record

ArticleBMC global and public health2025

Case study guided development of an implementation science framework and checklist for campus sexual violence intervention.

Rebecca Fielding-Miller, Anh Vo, Vinton Omaleki, Pinky Mahlangu, Yandisa Sikweyiya, Fortunate Shabalala, Sakhile Masuku, Menelisi T T Dlamini, Mercilene Machisa

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC global and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rebecca Fielding-MillerHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, USA. rfieldingmiller@health.ucsd.edu.
Anh VoHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, USA.
Vinton OmalekiHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, USA.
Pinky MahlanguSouth African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Yandisa SikweyiyaSouth African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Fortunate ShabalalaDepartment of Community Health Nursing, University of Eswatini, Kwaluseni, Eswatini.
Sakhile MasukuDepartment of Community Health Nursing, University of Eswatini, Kwaluseni, Eswatini.
Menelisi T T DlaminiDepartment of Community Health Nursing, University of Eswatini, Kwaluseni, Eswatini.
Mercilene MachisaSouth African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCampus sexual violence interventions must be scalable and effective in real-world settings. However, campus sexual violence interventions have unique implementation contexts that are not fully addressed by the most common implementation science (IS) frameworks. Hybrid studies-designs that incorporate effectiveness and implementation outcomes into a single trial-are an important tool to shorten the translation pipeline and enhance the efficacy and effectiveness of these interventions. We conducted a series of case studies to explore the applicability of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to campus sexual violence interventions and to develop an adapted framework and checklist that could be used to advance the IS of campus sexual violence intervention research.

methodsWe developed four case studies of campus sexual violence interventions from the United States, South Africa, and Eswatini. Two were delivered digitally (United States and Eswatini) and two were delivered in person (South Africa and Eswatini). We analyzed these cases using a comparative design guided by CFIR's theorized constructs, aiming to identify IS concerns that are likely unique to campus sexual violence implementation (CSVI) research. These analyses were used to develop a CSVI-specific IS checklist and planning worksheet.

resultsWe identified multiple cross-cutting issues unique to the IS of campus sexual violence interventions: policy and legal framework, team praxis, relationships, context, infrastructure, and people. We situated these within a conceptual framework to reflect their intersections and developed a checklist of considerations at the planning, implementation, and post-project reflection phases.

conclusionsThe field of campus sexual violence intervention research will benefit from the integration of IS methodologies. While we found CFIR to be a useful starting point, it requires certain key modifications to fully support sexual violence intervention research. The adapted CFIR framework we developed from a cross-national set of case studies offers a valuable tool to meet the needs of funders, researchers, and practitioners in the global north and south.

Indexed as

Campus sexual violenceGender-based violenceGlobal healthImplementation scienceTranslational research

Identifiers

PMID41291888
PMCPMC12649002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.