ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Human, economic, and social impact of lysosomal storage diseases.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLysosomal storage disorders (LSDs) are a group of rare metabolic conditions caused by enzyme deficiencies, leading to the accumulation of macromolecules within lysosomes. These disorders significantly impact patients' quality of life (QoL) and impose substantial financial burdens on families and healthcare systems. This study aimed to evaluate the daily life impact and economic burden of LSDs on patients, caregivers, the Spanish Health System (SHS), and society.
methodsThis cross-sectional study used an ad hoc questionnaire targeting Spanish LSD patients and their caregivers. The questionnaire was based on a literature review and insights from patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals (HCPs). Data were collected on sociodemographic characteristics, clinical variables, QoL, and economic costs. Caregivers provided responses on behalf of both themselves and the patients. Direct and indirect costs were assessed based on healthcare resource utilisation, productivity losses, and patient-incurred expenses.
resultsThe study included data on 86 patients, with 22 patients responding on their own behalf and 64 caregivers responding on behalf of themselves and their patient. Twelve different LSDs were identified, with Sanfilippo (22.1%) and Fabry (18.1%) being the most prevalent. The mean age at diagnosis was 9.9 years, with an average diagnostic delay of 4.3 years. Patients required an average of 107.8 medical visits per year, many of which were out-of-pocket, particularly for physiotherapy (28.6 visits/year) and psychological services. The total annual cost per patient was €228,232.60, with direct costs to the SHS accounting for 81.4% of this amount. Indirect costs, primarily due to informal caregiving and productivity losses, represented 15.9%. Families bore an average annual cost of €6,170.20, mainly for formal care and non-covered medical expenses. Clinically, 29.1% of patients had severe-to-profound functional limitations, and 31.4% had cognitive limitations, significantly affecting their daily activities, mobility, and emotional well-being.
conclusionsLSDs impose a substantial economic and social burden on patients and their families, with high healthcare costs and significant productivity losses. The study underscores the need for comprehensive support strategies addressing both economic and social challenges faced by affected families. Future research should explore country-specific economic impacts and develop policies to mitigate the financial strain on these families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.