ArticleBMC psychology2025
Unraveling the temporal dynamics of psychological inflexibility and non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents: a three-wave random intercept cross-lagged panel analysis.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explores the longitudinal relationship between psychological inflexibility and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) in adolescents, addressing a gap in the existing literature. A three-wave longitudinal design was adopted, with a random-intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM) applied to differentiate between-person and within-person effects. The findings revealed a robust model fit (χ2(43) = 280.733, p < 0.001, CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.04 (95%CI [0.04, 0.05])). At the between-person level, there was no significant association between psychological inflexibility and NSSI (β = 0.54, SE = 1.73, p = 0.75), whereas psychological inflexibility significantly predicted NSSI at the within-person level (β = 0.16, SE = 0.06, p = 0.01). Additionally, the study identified that external factors like location of residence and family economic status significantly influenced NSSI. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the role of psychological inflexibility in NSSI and highlight the importance of targeting this construct in therapeutic interventions for adolescents. Through a longitudinal approach, the study provides valuable insights into the dynamic mechanisms underlying NSSI behaviors, offering significant implications for clinical practice and future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.