ArticleTrials2025
A qualitative study of clinicians' perspectives on participating in an intrapartum randomised placebo-controlled trial for labour pain relief.
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSupporting intrapartum research through recruitment and intervention delivery and data collection can be challenging for clinical midwives. While there is a need for high-quality evidence of effective care during labour and birth, there are very few midwifery-led randomised controlled trials conducted during this period. Similarly, there is little research on the motivating factors and challenges for clinicians associated with intrapartum research.
aimOur aim was to explore the experiences of midwives who participated in a placebo-controlled intrapartum trial.
methodsMidwives who had participated in a trial investigating the use of sterile water injections for managing abdominal labour pain were invited to participate. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via videoconferencing. Data were transcribed and analysed thematically.
resultsInterviews were conducted with 11 midwives. Three themes were identified: (i) introducing a novel treatment for labour pain; (ii) the conflict of care and placebo and (iii) participating in a clinical trial.
conclusionsParticipants described experiences ranging from the support for an experimental analgesia and expectations of effect, to reservations to participants potentially encountering the placebo treatment. At times the experiences were both positive and negative. Midwives often found the timing of providing trial information and obtaining informed consent challenging. Our findings highlight the challenges encountered by midwives when presenting trial information, establishing equipoise and the timing for these to occur during labour.
trial registrationThe trial is registered at the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Trial ID: ACTRN12621001036808). Registration date 5/08/2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.