ReviewFluids and barriers of the CNS2025
Hydrogel-based microfluidic model of the blood-brain barrier: progress and future perspectives.
Review in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishment of an in vitro human blood-brain barrier model for antiviral screening against neurotropic viruses.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2026Article
- Biomedical Materials and Fabrication Methods for Construction of In Vitro Neurovascular Unit Models.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of brain-targeted delivery systems is significantly hindered by the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which prevents drugs from effectively reaching therapeutic regions in the brain. To evaluate drug efficacy and study pathogenesis, BBB models are used to simulate the brain microenvironment and the action of the BBB. In vitro models, which overcome the cost and ethical issues associated with animal models and avoid species-specific differences, are particularly valuable. However, traditional in vitro models, such as two-dimensional cell cultures and transwell systems, lack three-dimensional structure and physiological and mechanical conditions, including shear stress, making it challenging for endothelial cells (ECs) to recapitulate BBB properties. Recent advancements have incorporated microfluidics and gel materials to support cell growth into BBB models, enabling near physiological replication of the BBB in vitro to mimic pathogenesis and critical physiological and pathological processes. This paper discusses recent advancements in in vitro BBB modeling, current design concepts for microfluidic BBB models, and key influencing factors. It also reviews different types of hydrogels used in microfluidic platforms for the BBB, highlighting their respective features. Furthermore, it explores potential biocompatible hydrogel structures for future applications in microfluidic BBB models, aiming to provide valuable data and a theoretical foundation for future BBB model optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.