ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2025
Use of digital media device in pediatric adolescents affected by anorexia nervosa.
Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the last years the use of digital media devices (MD) among adolescents has increased exponentially, becoming a central component of daily life for many young. The aim of the present study is to explore the use of MD in adolescents affected by anorexia nervosa (AN), compared to healthy ones. Furthermore, we compared MD use between inpatient and outpatient adolescents with AN.
methodsThis single-center prospective study enrolled patients aged 9-18 years affected by AN and admitted at IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy, between January 2024 and August 2024. Participants completed a questionnaire to explore their relationship with MD in terms of time of use, addiction, activities, parents' role, MD consequences and children perception. Results from AN patients were then compared to those of the general population cohort described in our previous paper.
resultsDuring the study period, 113 patients were enrolled. AN patients spent less time per day on screens compared to controls. In detail, the majority of AN adolescents (40.6%) spent between two and three hours per day on MD, while most of the control group (54%) spends more than three hours per day on screen (p < 0.001). Furthermore, both AN (69.9%) and control (56%) group primarily uses MD before going to bed. Finally, most of AN individual (43.6%) primarily uses devices for browsing social networks, showing a statistically significant difference compared to controls (24.0%, p = 0.044). Notably, children aged 9-14 years also largely use MD to access social networks (40.8%). AN outpatients statistically use MD for a prolonged time compared to AN inpatients.
conclusionAN patients spend less time per day on screens compared to the general population. This habit may find a possible explanation in a polarization of thinking about food. An alarming fact is the strong relationship of adolescents with MD even among the youngest - aged 9-14 years - and the difficulty in renouncing it for a limited period. In conclusion, we believe it is necessary to intensify controls in order to safeguard the mental health of children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.