ArticleParasites & vectors2025
Intermediate host recognition abilities of Fasciola hepatica miracidia.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFasciola hepatica, the causative agent of fascioliasis in sheep and cattle, requires a compatible snail intermediate host to complete its life cycle. The aquatic larval stage of this parasite is well-adapted for host-finding, with chemotactic abilities that enable it to sense potential host biomolecules. The extent of intermediate host recognition, particularly at the species level, and the downstream correlation with successful attachment has not been explored. This study investigated the ability of F. hepatica miracidia to distinguish between native and invasive host and non-host freshwater snail species during the host-finding and host-attachment phases.
methodsQuantitative and qualitative measurements of miracidial behaviour were compared pre- and post-exposure with snail-conditioned water (SCW) from both native and invasive host snails (lymnaeids Austropeplea cf. brazieri and Pseudosuccinea columella) and non-host snails (the lymnaeid Bullastra lessoni and the physid Physa acuta). Miracidia were also exposed to live snails of each representative species to ascertain whether host-finding correlates with successful miracidial host-attachment.
resultsMiracidia displayed clear shifts in movement profiles post-exposure to SCW, with no qualitative or quantitative differences observed in the behavioural response to different snail species. When exposed to live snails, miracidia were more likely to attach to both host and non-host native species (A. cf. brazieri and B. lessoni) compared with invasive snail species (P. columella and P. acuta). Among invasive snails, miracidia had a higher rate of successful attachment with P. columella (host) than with P. acuta (non-host).
conclusionsThe miracidia of F. hepatica exhibit analogous host-finding responses post-exposure to SCW, regardless of which snail species they are exposed to. Host-finding responses do not correlate with miracidial ability to attach to the snail tissue or with the established host status of the respective snail species. These results provide an insight into host-finding preferences of F. hepatica within the Australian context and lay an important foundation for further exploration into intermediate host-parasite interactions and their mechanisms of action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.