SynthesisBiomedical engineering online2025
Artificial intelligence at the gut-oral microbiota frontier: mapping machine learning tools for gastric cancer risk prediction.
Synthesis in Biomedical engineering online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A machine learning model for distinguishing gastric cancer from intestinal metaplasia in patients with psychological symptoms.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- Gastric Microbiota Dysbiosis and Microbiome-Based Interventions in Chronic Atrophic Gastritis.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Microbiome and cancer: mechanistic insights, diagnostic potential, and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastric cancer (GC) remains a significant global health burden, with high mortality due to delayed diagnosis. Advances in microbiome profiling and artificial intelligence (AI) have opened new frontiers in non-invasive cancer risk prediction. However, the methodological landscape of AI-driven microbiome-based GC prediction remains fragmented and poorly standardized.
objectiveTo systematically review and critically evaluate artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models developed for gastric cancer prediction using microbial and non-invasive biomarkers, spanning gut, gastric mucosal, and oral ecosystems as well as tongue-based imaging proxies. We aimed to map methodological rigor, translational readiness, and biomarker convergence across these domains.
methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for peer-reviewed studies published up to March 2025. Eligible studies applied ML or deep learning models to microbiome datasets for GC diagnosis, risk classification, or treatment response. Data extraction included sample source, sequencing method, taxonomic resolution, ML model type, validation strategy, performance metrics, interpretability tools, and reported microbial taxa. Descriptive synthesis, thematic clustering, and readiness scoring were conducted using structured visual analytics.
resultsNine studies met the inclusion criteria. Sample sources included gastric mucosa, feces, saliva, tongue coating, and tumor tissue. 16S rRNA sequencing was most common, with models primarily trained on genus-level data. Random Forest was the most frequently used algorithm (44.4%), followed by LASSO, LightGBM, and deep learning. AUC values ranged from 0.88 to 0.97 in validated models. However, only 33.3% of studies employed external validation, and interpretability and reporting standards varied widely. A Clinical Readiness Matrix and Validation Quality Assessment highlighted key translational gaps. Recurrent microbial biomarkers included Veillonella, Fusobacterium, Prevotella, and Porphyromonas.
conclusionAI-based microbiome models, including non-invasive diagnostics, show high potential for gastric cancer prediction. Yet, reproducibility, external validation, and reporting transparency remain critical barriers to clinical implementation. Standardized pipelines, multi-omics integration, and prospective validation are needed to transition this field from proof-of-concept to precision oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.