ArticleBMC veterinary research2025
Seasonal and biological drivers of gastrointestinal parasites in wild rodents from two areas with different anthropogenic pressures in a semi-arid region.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Eco-epidemiology ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEnvironmental and biological factors can regulate host-parasite interactions. However, in the context of habitat alteration due to human-induced activities, little is known about its effects on parasite infections in wildlife populations. This study focused on the study of 363 wild rodents (Phyllotis darwini Waterhouse 1837) inhabiting two areas with different anthropogenic pressures (i.e., non-altered [protected] and altered [rural] area) in the Coquimbo Region, in Chile, during five consecutive seasons (2021-2022). Coprological examinations were carried out using the Mini-FLOTAC method, and factors associated with parasite infections (i.e., seasons, site types, sex, and body mass) were evaluated.
resultsThe overall prevalence of gastrointestinal parasitism was 74.9% (272/363), and 16 parasite taxa were found, some of which were reported for the first time in P. darwini, such as Archiacanthocephala, Ascaridina, Trichosomoididae, Schistosoma sp., Isospora spp., Giardia sp., and Entamoebidae. The best predictors of parasitism included type of site, seasonality, and body condition. The infection probability and density (as eggs/oocysts per gram of feces) of some parasite taxa were lower in rodents inhabiting the rural area compared to those in the protected area, but no difference was observed in the gastrointestinal parasite richness according to the type of site. Seasonal effects were also observed, with a higher likelihood of parasite infection and greater parasite richness in winter and spring of 2022 in both protected and rural areas. Rodents with higher scaled body mass index showed higher likelihood of parasite infection and higher parasite richness in both kinds of areas. Sex-biased parasitism was not detected in adults.
conclusionsThe results presented in this one-year study indicate that gastrointestinal parasites in Phyllotis darwini in north-central Chile are influenced by habitat alteration, seasonality, and body mass. Reduction of host populations due to anthropogenic effects may limit parasite transmission in altered sites. Non-native hosts may still introduce new species to the parasite fauna of P. darwini in the altered area. Seasonal patterns may be explained by favorable biotic and abiotic conditions during wetter winter, for both hosts and developmental parasitic stages, including time-lagged effects extended into spring. Finally, larger rodents may show higher exposure to parasite transmission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.