ArticleBMC health services research2025
Partners, coordinators and high-level leaders' perspectives on a consumer and community involvement program in Australia: a qualitative evaluation using template analysis.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Closing the Feedback Loop: Improving Communication of Findings With Aboriginal Research Participants Through Participatory Action Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A Consumer and Community Involvement program located in Australia supports consumers, community members and researchers to work in partnership with health research priorities, policy and practice. The program is positioned to enhance Consumer and Community Involvement (CCI) at individual, organisational, and system levels. Partners are key to the program's development, growth and sustainment. This study explored various partner perspectives on their involvement within the CCI program, including individuals (consumers, researchers) organisations (universities, medical research institutes) and the system level (funding organisations) alongside CCI program coordinators (delivering the program) and high-level leaders (decision-makers/executive leaders/directors). Data were collected via two focus groups (10 consumer and community involvement members), 12 interviews (researchers, universities, funding organisations, and medical research institutes), nine qualitative proformas - open-text box surveys (CCI program coordinators (current and previous) and high-level leaders) between March-June 2024. Data were de-identified and Template Analysis was conducted and informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Two themes were produced: (1) 'Consumer and Community Involvement program structures' describes the structures of the inner setting (e.g., expertise and support offered, tailored partnerships), and the outer setting (e.g., funding policies, outer consumer and community networks, hub and spoke approach). (2) 'Processes for connecting consumer/community and researchers' describe the process (e.g., the communication channels and a bridge between consumer/community members and researchers). This study improves understanding of the planned and tailored structures and processes that embed CCI across individuals, organisations and system levels while highlighting opportunities to strengthen internal consumer connections and diversify consumer representation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.