Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41291723›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

The current legislative framework hinders implementation of midwife-led models of care: South African context.

Kagiso P Tukisi, Wanda Jacobs, Zelda Janse van Rensburg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kagiso P TukisiDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa. kagisot28@gmail.com.
Wanda JacobsDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Zelda Janse van RensburgDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe midwife specialists’ training was introduced in South Africa in 1980. The healthcare landscape in South Africa presents a critical challenge in maximising the potential of highly trained midwife specialists. Despite significant investments in advanced midwifery education and training, existing practice regulations continue to create substantial barriers to midwife-led models of care that prevent these skilled professionals from fully utilizing their extensive knowledge and expertise in primary caregiving and autonomous practice.

objectivesThe purpose of the study is to examine how the current legislative framework in South Africa is creating barriers that prevent midwife specialists from implementing midwife-led models of care.

methodsA qualitative, descriptive, and exploratory research design was followed. Sixteen purposefully sampled midwife specialists participated in the focus group discussions, which were held virtually via Microsoft Teams and recorded. The recordings were transcribed verbatim, and data were analysed using Collaizi’s descriptive method based on the emerging themes and categories.

resultsThree themes emerged detailing how the current legislative framework hinders the implementation of midwife-led models of care. Theme one highlights the regulatory Constraints on Midwife Specialists’ Practice. Theme two elucidates the apparent disconnect between advanced training and regulatory Frameworks. Lastly, theme 3 highlighted the systemic implications of these legislative barriers for healthcare delivery and the professional identity of midwife specialists.

conclusionsThe study focused on the disconnect between the advanced training provided to midwife specialists and the regulatory environment that limits their ability to practice to the full extent of their capabilities and training.

Indexed as

Advanced practiceBarriersHealthcare deliveryLegislative frameworkMidwife-led careMidwife specialistsProfessional autonomyRegulatory constraintsScope of practice

Identifiers

PMID41291723
PMCPMC12751122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.