ArticleBMC health services research2025
Ranking patients' non-clinical preferences in referring to specialist physicians in the private sector: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding non-clinical factors that influence how women choose obstetricians and gynecologists (OB/GYNs) is essential for delivering patient-centered care. This study aimed to identify and rank the non-clinical preferences when selecting OB/GYN specialists in the private healthcare sector in Mashhad, Iran.
methodsThis cross-sectional study, conducted from January to February 2018, 462 patients completed a validated 45-item questionnaire (CVI = 0.80, Cronbach's alpha = 0.88) assessing their non-clinical preferences. Preferences were rated on a 5-point scale and ranked using Friedman's test. Associations between demographic factors and preferences were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and ordinal logistic regression.
resultsThe highest-rated criteria included physicians' attentiveness and respect for patients, respectful staff behavior, short waiting times, and ensuring privacy during examinations. The latest important criteria were physician age, university affiliation, and office proximity to patient's home. Education level, pregnancy experience, and number of prior OB/GYN visits were significantly associated with certain preferences. Multivariate regression revealed that higher education and more prior OB/GYN visits independently predicted greater importance placed on short waiting time and respectful staff behavior.
conclusionBeyond clinical competence, non-clinical factors-particularly those related to interpersonal behavior, communication, and privacy-are central to patient-centered care in OB/GYN settings. Recognizing and integrating these preferences into service delivery can strengthen trust, enhance satisfaction, and support ethical, patient-centered care in the private healthcare sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.