ArticleBMC women's health2025
Screening for cervical cancer among adult women: a self-reported nationwide study in Ghana.
Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers to Accessing Cervical Cancer Screening and Treatment in the Amazon Region-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 1B promotes cervical cancer cell tumorigenesis in vitro and in vivo.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- "My Wife's Healthcare Is my Healthcare": A Qualitative Study Exploring Family-Centered Strategies to Enhance Cervical Cancer Prevention in Northern Ghana.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCervical cancer remains a significant global health challenge, despite advancements in screening and treatment. As one of the most preventable and curable cancers, its burden disproportionately affects women in low- and middle-income countries where access to screening programs and healthcare services is limited. Screening for cervical cancer has evolved significantly over the decades, with the advent of cytology-based Pap smears and more recently, human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, offering improved sensitivity and specificity in detecting precancerous lesions. Effective screening programs have led to a substantial reduction in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in many high-income countries. However, disparities persist due to variations in healthcare infrastructure, socioeconomic factors, and awareness levels among women. This manuscript explores uptake of screening test, type of tests and barriers to periodic uptake of screening among adult women in Ghana.
methodsA nationwide survey was conducted, using a nationally representative sample of 3,326 women aged 18 to 69, and the data were analyzed using Stata 17. The study forms part of the WHO STEPwise approach to NCD risk factor surveillance (STEPS).
resultsThe results showed generally low screening uptake, particularly among women aged 30–49, who are considered a high-risk group. The HPV-DNA test (70.42%) was the most reported screening method, while 29.58% of women were screened using the Pap smear. The primary barrier to screening uptake was a lack of knowledge about how or where to access testing services.
conclusionThe study highlights the need for increased community awareness and education on cervical cancer screening. Integrating cervical cancer screening education into routine sexual and reproductive health programs offers a promising approach to raising awareness and improving uptake, which could help reduce the burden of cervical cancer in Ghana.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.