Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41291663›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Assigning cancer stage to patients using administrative claims data: an example for colon and rectal cancers.

Rebecca A Smith, Xiting Cao, Gebra Cuyun Carter, Ifrah Fayyaz, Andreyah Pope, Phil Ellenberg, Lesley-Ann Miller-Wilson, Paul J Limburg, Bruce Pyenson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rebecca A SmithNew York-Atlanta Health, Milliman, Inc., New York, NY, USA. rebecca.smith@milliman.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3667-4740
Xiting CaoHEOR, Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.
Gebra Cuyun CarterHEOR, Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6549-0069
Ifrah FayyazNew York-Atlanta Health, Milliman, Inc., New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4072-6629
Andreyah PopeNew York-Atlanta Health, Milliman, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Phil EllenbergNew York-Atlanta Health, Milliman, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Lesley-Ann Miller-WilsonHEOR, Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.
Paul J LimburgHEOR, Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2428-5675
Bruce PyensonNew York-Atlanta Health, Milliman, Inc., New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0416-9391

Funding

NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800009CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800009INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800015CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800015INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800032CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800032I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study sought to design predictive machine learning models to assign stage at diagnosis to colorectal cancer patients using only administrative claims data. The models were subsequently applied to Medicare fee for service (FFS) and commercially insured populations to assess the relationship between healthcare costs and stage at diagnosis.

methodsFFS patients diagnosed with colon or rectal cancer tumors in 2016 or 2017 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked dataset. Patients were assigned a cancer stage via multinomial logistic regression using treatment and demographic variables derived from claims data. The models were applied to data from colorectal cancer patients observed in a commercially insured population, and cumulative allowed costs for one to three years post-diagnosis were summarized by stage and compared across insurance coverages (FFS and commercial).

resultsThe predictive cancer staging models achieved an overall staging accuracy of 83% (colon) and 69% (rectal) for newly diagnosed patients. When used to examine healthcare costs by stage, costs for patients diagnosed at stages IIC/III/IV were 2-4x higher than those of patients diagnosed at stages 0/I/IIA/IIB. Average costs for commercially insured patients were 30-40% higher than Medicare patients' costs.

conclusionsNovel multinomial logistic regression models successfully predicted incident colorectal cancer patients' stages at diagnosis using administrative claims data alone. When applied to FFS and commercial populations, use of model-predicted staging confirmed that colorectal cancer patients' costs increase substantially as stage at diagnosis increases. This suggests earlier diagnosis of colorectal cancer could reduce treatment costs.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsMachine LearningNeoplasm StagingRectal NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansInsurance Claim ReviewLogistic ModelsMaleMedicareSEER ProgramUnited StatesAdministrative claimsCancer stagingColorectal cancerCost of careMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41291663
PMCPMC12763972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.