Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41291662›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2025

Chemical composition and acaricidal properties of essential oils from Cinnamomum mollifolium, Eucalyptus globulus, and Pimenta dioica against Hyalomma rufipes (Acari: Ixodidae).

Xiaolong Yang, Songbo Zhang, Jingyao Gao, Ruya Cao, Weijia Xing, Jiayi Zhang, Weikang Zhao, Xinyu Zhang, Zhihua Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiaolong Yang *Hebei Key Laboratory of Animal Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Collaborative Innovation Center for Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, 050024, Hebei, China.
Songbo Zhang *Hebei Key Laboratory of Animal Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Collaborative Innovation Center for Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, 050024, Hebei, China.
Jingyao Gao *Hebei Key Laboratory of Animal Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Collaborative Innovation Center for Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, 050024, Hebei, China.
Ruya CaoHebei Key Laboratory of Animal Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Collaborative Innovation Center for Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, 050024, Hebei, China.
Weijia XingHebei Key Laboratory of Animal Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Collaborative Innovation Center for Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, 050024, Hebei, China.
Jiayi ZhangHebei Key Laboratory of Animal Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Collaborative Innovation Center for Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, 050024, Hebei, China.
Weikang ZhaoHebei Key Laboratory of Animal Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Collaborative Innovation Center for Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, 050024, Hebei, China.
Xinyu ZhangHebei Key Laboratory of Animal Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Collaborative Innovation Center for Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, 050024, Hebei, China.
Zhihua GaoHebei Key Laboratory of Animal Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Collaborative Innovation Center for Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, 050024, Hebei, China. gaozhihua@hebtu.edu.cn.

Funding

Foundation of Hebei Normal University L2023B56National Natural Science Foundation of China 31472050Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province C2023205011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHyalomma rufipes (H. rufipes) ticks are widespread in Africa, Europe, and Asia. They transmit crimean-congo hemorrhagic fever virus, rickettsia, and midichloria, posing a significant risk to public health and livestock development. Developing acaricides based on plant essential oils (EOs) have risen, yet matters regarding their mechanism and feasible methods for tick tests remain unanswered. The aim of this study was to identify the chemical constituents of three EOs and evaluate their acaricidal activity against larval and adult ticks of H. rufipes, as well as to establish an artificial membrane feeding technique to explore the feasibility of Cinnamomum mollifolium EO for tick control in vitro.

resultsIn this study, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used to analyze the constituents of C. mollifolium, Eucalyptus globulus, and Pimenta dioica EOs, as well as to investigate their potential application in H. rufipes control. The main compound in C. mollifolium EO is (E)-Cinnamaldehyde (93.15%). Eucalyptus globulus EO comprises eucalyptol (61.02%) and l-(+)-Ascorbic acid 2,6-dihexadecanoate (35.89%). Pimenta dioica EO predominantly includes eugenol (73.67%), 1,2-dimethoxy-4-(2-propenyl)-benzene (13.04%), and caryophyllene (7.24%). Larval packet tests revealed that the EOs of C. mollifolium, E. globulus, and P. dioica exhibited notable larvicidal activity, with lethal concentration (LC

conclusionThis study offers useful information on the chemical makeup and tick-killing ability of essential oils from C. mollifolium, E. globulus, and P. dioica against ticks. The acaricidal potency of C. mollifolium EO significantly surpasses that of both E. globulus and P. dioica EOs. The effective use of artificial membrane feeding technology also highlights its value for future tick control research and applications.

Indexed as

AcaricidesCinnamomumEucalyptusIxodidaeOils, VolatilePimentaAnimalsFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryLarvaAcaricidesOils, VolatileAcaricidal activityArtificial membraneComponent analysisEssential oilTick control

Identifiers

PMID41291662
PMCPMC12645713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.