ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Domain and Language adaptive pre-training of BERT models for Korean-English bilingual clinical text analysis.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop bilingual Korean-English medical language models through domain- and language-adaptive pre-training and evaluate their performance in clinical text analysis tasks, specifically semantic similarity and multi-label classification.
methodsA bilingual corpus comprising Korean (medical textbooks and online health articles) and English (medical textbooks, health-related articles, and MIMIC-IV EHRs) clinical texts were constructed. Three BERT-based foundation models (Korea Medical [KM-BERT], English Biomedical [BioBERT], and multilingual general domain [M-BERT]) underwent additional pre-training using a newly created bilingual WordPiece vocabulary (45,000 tokens). Model performance was assessed intrinsically on the medical semantic textual similarity (MedSTS) benchmark and extrinsically through multi-label classification of chest computed tomography (CT) reports from tertiary hospitals. Macro F1 scores and Pearson’s correlation coefficients were used as primary evaluation metrics.
resultsAfter bilingual pre-training, the Korean semantic similarity performance of bi-BioBERT improved significantly from a Pearson correlation coefficient ranging 0.190–0.871. In the multi-label classification of chest CT reports, all bilingual models outperformed their respective foundation models; bi-KM-BERT achieved the highest Macro F1 score in both internal (0.9460 vs. 0.8902 for KM-BERT) and external validation (0.9288 vs. 0.8495 for KM-BERT). However, bi-KM-BERT and bi-M-BERT experienced semantic performance declines in Korean tasks, indicating catastrophic forgetting, and gradient-based token-importance heatmaps confirmed that the bilingual models captured critical cross-lingual medical contexts more effectively.
conclusionThe findings underscore that careful bilingual vocabulary curation and targeted domain-adaptive pre-training enhance natural language processing (NLP) performance in multilingual clinical environments, even with modest training resources. Continual-learning strategies should be explored to mitigate minor forgetting effects. Domain- and language-adaptive pre-training of bilingual medical corpora improves NLP model performance in multilingual clinical settings, thereby providing a scalable strategy for enhancing clinical text analysis capabilities in resource-limited bilingual contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.