Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41291635›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Your project or our project? Evaluating the participatory development of an adolescent healthy sleep intervention.

Ann Vandendriessche, Maïté Verloigne, Karlien Dhondt, Teatske M Altenburg, Babette Demeester, Benedicte Deforche

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ann VandendriesscheDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 4K3, Ghent, 9000, Belgium. ann.vandendriessche@ugent.be.
Maïté VerloigneDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 4K3, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.
Karlien DhondtDepartment of Psychiatry: Pediatric Sleep Center, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 4K3, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.
Teatske M AltenburgDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands.
Babette DemeesterDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 4K3, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.
Benedicte DeforcheDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 4K3, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.

Funding

Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent 01D26318Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G089723N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR) is a promising approach to develop health promotion interventions, but more evaluation is necessary to optimize collaboration with youth. This study evaluates the participatory process of developing a school-based healthy sleep intervention from the perspective of participating adolescents. In three schools, action teams (n = 3-12, 13-15-year-olds) held weekly sessions (n = 29-34 per school) guided by the theory-based Intervention Mapping protocol to develop school-specific interventions. Based on scientific principles of YPAR and empowerment theory, the way of operating, capacity building, feeling heard, ownership, level of participation, empowerment and group dynamic was evaluated through focus groups with each action team at four time points during the process. Thematic content analysis was performed using NVivo 11, resulting in eight themes: (1) overall experience of the participatory project, (2) motivation to join the action team, (3) action team composition and collaboration, (4) role of the researcher, (5) participatory sessions, (6) participatory principles, (7) school support and (8) the participatory developed intervention. The action teams reported learning about sleep hygiene, project management and social interactions. Adolescents felt empowered and ownership through shared decision making. They appreciated the structure brought by the researcher and indicated the good relationship with the researcher to be important. Future researchers should consider using more active methods during the third step of Intervention Mapping and involving important other stakeholders earlier in the participatory process, to create support for and familiarity with the intervention amongst all stakeholders before implementation.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchHealth PromotionSchool Health ServicesSleepAdolescentChildFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationAdolescentsHealthy sleep interventionsIntervention mapping protocolYouth participatory action research

Identifiers

PMID41291635
PMCPMC12764047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.