ArticleBMC cancer2025
Impact of comorbidities on survival in melanoma patients.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The impact of prevalent primary cancers in melanoma patients on survival.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing incidence of cutaneous melanoma (CM) is a significant public health issue. However, few studies have focused on how comorbidity patterns may influence the outcomes of CM patients. This study aimed to identify comorbidity patterns among CM patients and assess their impact on survival rates.
methodsThis retrospective population-based cohort study included all CM patients recorded in the regional Veneto Cancer Registry in 2019 and 2021. Comorbidity data (ICD-9-CM coding) were obtained from hospital discharge records and included 17 primary disease categories. Patients with at least two documented conditions were clustered via latent class analysis (LCA), with the optimal number of clusters determined via the Akaike information criterion (AIC).
resultsThis population-based retrospective cohort study included 2,114 CM patients. Coexisting medical conditions were documented in 1,048 (49.6%) patients; multiple conditions were documented in 19.9% of the study cohort. Among these patients, the LCA identified three patterns: (1) cardio-endocrine-respiratory (20.96%); (2) pregnancy-psychosocial (29.97%); and (3) injury-multiorgan-multifactorial disorders (49.08%). Patients in the injury-multiorgan-multifactorial class had the highest mortality risk (HR = 3.08, 95% CI: 2.25-4.22).
conclusionsComorbidity class has a significant effect on the survival of CM patients. The incorporation of the comorbidity profile into clinical care strategies can improve prognostic accuracy and enhance patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.