Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41291591›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2025

Three-dimensional evaluation of stability after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery for skeletal class III malocclusion in patients with cleft lip and palate.

Ming Gao, Yongwei Tao, Sisi Bi, Jinfeng Li, Zhanping Ren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation of Orbitomalar Region Projection İn Patients With Operated Cleft Lip and Palate Part 2: Effect of Maxillary Position.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ming GaoKey Laboratory of Shaanxi Province for Craniofacial Precision Medicine Research, College of Stomatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Yongwei TaoKey Laboratory of Shaanxi Province for Craniofacial Precision Medicine Research, College of Stomatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Sisi BiKey Laboratory of Shaanxi Province for Craniofacial Precision Medicine Research, College of Stomatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Jinfeng LiKey Laboratory of Shaanxi Province for Craniofacial Precision Medicine Research, College of Stomatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Zhanping RenKey Laboratory of Shaanxi Province for Craniofacial Precision Medicine Research, College of Stomatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China. zhanping@mail.xjtu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing three-dimensional reconstruction technology, we evaluated postoperative jawbone stability in patients with cleft lip and palate and skeletal Class III malocclusion following bimaxillary surgery-maxillary advancement via LeFort I osteotomy and mandibular retraction via bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.

methodsTwenty patients with cleft lip and palate who underwent bimaxillary surgery due to maxillary hypoplasia were selected for the study. Computed tomography (CT) images were collected at preoperative (T0), immediate postoperative (T1), and postoperative follow-up (T2) time points. The spatial distances (A-C, A-F, A-S, B-C, B-F, B-S) of points A (subspinale) and B (supramental) from the baseline coronal (C), horizontal (F), and sagittal (S) planes, as well as the spatial angles of the angles SNA, SNB, and ANB, were measured in the three periods after three-dimensional reconstruction utilizing Mimics21 software. Compare the changes in the three periods.

results1. All indicators from T0 to T1 showed statistically significant changes, P < 0.05.2. From T1 to T2, the average B-C increased by 2.25 mm, the average B-F decreased by 2.64 mm, the angle SNB increased by 1.25° on average, and the angle ANB decreased by 1.12° on average. All these changes were statistically significant (P < 0.05). However, the changes in the distance A-F, A-C, and the angle SNA were not statistically significant, P > 0.05.3. From T0 to T2, the average A-C increased by 3.16 mm, the average A-F increased by 1.81 mm, the average B-C decreased by 3.56 mm, the angle SNA increased by 2.77° on average, SNB decreased by 2.53° on average, and the angle ANB increased by 6.22° on average. All these changes were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The changes in A-S, B-F, and B-S were not statistically significant (P > 0.05).

conclusionBimaxillary surgery is an effective method for correcting skeletal Class III malocclusion in patients with cleft lip and palate. The planned surgical movement of the mandible via bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) with setback allows for compensatory reduction in the required maxillary advancement during LeFort I osteotomy. This approach may potentially reduce the extent of anteroposterior relapse in the maxilla.

Indexed as

Cleft LipCleft PalateImaging, Three-DimensionalMalocclusion, Angle Class IIIOrthognathic Surgical ProceduresAdolescentCephalometryFemaleHumansMaleMandibleMaxillaOsteotomy, Le FortOsteotomy, Sagittal Split RamusTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung AdultBimaxillary surgeryCleft lip and palateCTSkeletal class III malocclusionThree-dimensional reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID41291591
PMCPMC12649010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.