Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41291573›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025

Anisometropia in bilateral hyperopic refractive amblyopia requires eye patching.

Yukari Hasegawa, Satoshi Ueki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yukari HasegawaDivision of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Asahimachi-dori 1-757, Chuo-ku, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan.
Satoshi UekiDivision of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Asahimachi-dori 1-757, Chuo-ku, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan. sueki@med.niigata-u.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe anisometropic eye of patients with bilateral hyperopic refractive amblyopia is presumed to have worse prognosis for visual acuity than the fellow eye. We sought to investigate the effect of anisometropia on visual prognosis in patients with bilateral hyperopic refractive amblyopia in order to estimate the necessity and timing of patching.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 71 patients with bilateral hyperopic refractive amblyopia aged ≤ 5 years at the initial visit. Hyperopia was defined as spherical equivalent (SE) power of ≥2.0 diopters (D) in both eyes. Hyperopic anisometropia was defined as SE power ≥1.0 D. Age before the start of treatment and at the last observation; gender; cycloplegic refractive values before the start of treatment and at the last observation; visual acuity (converted to logMAR) before the start of treatment, 1 year after the start of treatment, and at the last observation; prevalence of strabismus; eye patching rate during the year after the initial visit; and stereoacuity at the last observation were analyzed. Patients with bilateral hyperopic refractive amblyopia were divided into groups with or without anisometropia. The group with anisometropia was subdivided into groups with greater or smaller hyperopia.

resultsOf 71 patients with hyperopic refractive amblyopia, 20 patients had anisometropia. Mean age ± standard deviation before the start of treatment was 35.1 ± 12.7 months in the group with anisometropia and 34.2 ± 12.7 months in the group without anisometropia (P = 0.798). SE values before the start of treatment were 7.08 ± 2.12 D in the group with greater hyperopia, 5.33 ± 1.91 D in the group with smaller hyperopia, and 6.44 ± 2.95 D in the group without anisometropia (P = 0.098). LogMAR before the start of treatment was 0.86 ± 0.25 in the group with greater hyperopia, 0.68 ± 0.29 in the group with smaller hyperopia, and 0.87 ± 0.30 in the group without anisometropia. LogMAR before the start of treatment was statistically significantly better in the group with smaller hyperopia than in the group without anisometropia (P = 0.028). LogMAR at 1 year after the start of treatment was 0.45 ± 0.30 in the group with greater hyperopia, 0.25 ± 0.31 in the group with smaller hyperopia, and 0.28 ± 0.27 in the group without anisometropia (P = 0.057). The eye patching rate during the year after the initial visit was higher in the group with anisometropia than in the group without anisometropia (55.0% vs. 13.7%, P = 0.001).

conclusionsThe presence of anisometropia in bilateral hyperopic refractive amblyopia might favor visual development in the eye with smaller hyperopia. Early spectacle use and eye patching might be important for the visual development of the eye with greater hyperopia.

Indexed as

AmblyopiaAnisometropiaHyperopiaSensory DeprivationChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleRefraction, OcularRetrospective StudiesVisual AcuityAnisometropiaEye pathingHyperopic refractive amblyopia

Identifiers

PMID41291573
PMCPMC12750730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.