ArticleBMC pediatrics2025
Development and internal validation of a clinical prediction model for the needed level of care in preterm neonates.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo address capacity problems at tertiary-level neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) within current staffing limitations, our study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of identifying very preterm neonates not in need of highly specialised, tertiary-level, NICU care.
methodsWe developed and internally validated a clinical prediction model to identify very preterm neonates in need of tertiary-level NICU care within the first 72 h after birth in the Netherlands. The outcome was defined as one or more of: 1) endotracheal surfactant administration, 2) endotracheal/mechanical ventilation, and 3) inotropic administration. Multivariable logistic regression, with a priori selected predictors, was used on a retrospective cohort of very preterm neonates admitted to the tertiary-level NICU of Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, between January 2018 and December 2022. Bootstrapping was used for internal validation.
resultsOf 654 included neonates, 45.1% (n = 295) needed tertiary-level NICU care. The final model included six predictors. Evaluating the model's discriminative performance resulted in an area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve of 0.77 [95%CI: 0.73-0.80]. A low-risk classification threshold of 20% yielded high sensitivity (93% [95%CI 90-96%]) and a specificity of 26% [95%CI: 22-31%], predicting a low risk of needing tertiary-level NICU care for 114 neonates, accurately selecting 94 of them.
conclusionThis prediction model demonstrates the feasibility of perinatal identification of very preterm neonates not in need of tertiary-level NICU care. Future research should focus on updating the model to a source population of women with imminent preterm birth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.