Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41291540›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2025

Interventions for adolescent school boys and young men to reduce gender-based violence in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Anita Kemi DaSilva-Ibru, Heidi Stöckl, Isabelle Pearson, Cathy Zimmerman

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anita Kemi DaSilva-IbruDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. anita.dasilva-ibru@lshtm.ac.uk.
Heidi StöcklInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometrics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine , Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Isabelle PearsonDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Cathy ZimmermanDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGBV is a widespread issue rooted in gender inequality that disproportionately affects women and girls worldwide. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), the problem is even more severe, with some regions reporting GBV rates as high as 50%. While most efforts to combat GBV focus on supporting women and girls, there is growing recognition that engaging boys and young men is essential for addressing the root causes of violence. This review examines interventions designed to reduce GBV perpetration among adolescent boys and young men in LMICs, aiming to identify effective strategies for fostering healthier attitudes and behaviors.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of studies published between 2000 and 2023, searching databases such as Embase, Global Health, MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo, and Africa Wide Information. Out of 2,728 records, 53 studies were assessed, and 12 met the criteria for inclusion. These studies included randomized control trials, quantitative and qualitative research, and interventions delivered in schools and communities. The focus was on programs targeting behavioral change, gender norms, and bystander intervention. The data were analyzed to evaluate their impact on GBV perpetration and victimization.

resultsThis review revealed that school- and community-based interventions can effectively reduce GBV perpetration and victimization among boys and young men. Most studies concluded that there was significant behavioral change and a reduction in the perpetration and experience of GBV postintervention. There was also a decrease in the perpetration and experience of forced sex, dating violence, and intimate partner violence. The influence of the bystander effect on young men's attitudes toward GBV was also reviewed; however, no statistically significant improvements were identified. Overall, the findings suggest that engaging boys and young men in GBV prevention can make a difference, but more work is needed to ensure a lasting impact.

conclusionsThis review highlights the importance of including boys and young men in efforts to prevent GBV, particularly in LMICs. Effective interventions sometimes combine education, community engagement, and activities that challenge harmful gender norms. These findings can guide policymakers and practitioners in designing programs that promote gender equality and reduce violence. However, more research is needed to understand how to sustain these changes over time and how to adapt interventions for different cultural contexts. By addressing both perpetrators and victims, we can move closer to achieving global goals such as ending violence against women and girls.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesGender-Based ViolenceAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleBehaviorBoysCommunityGenderInterventionLMICsMenSchoolSexualViolence

Identifiers

PMID41291540
PMCPMC12645783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.