Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41291535›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2025

Trends of musculoskeletal pain in children and young people consulting primary care: an electronic primary health care record study.

Kayleigh J Mason, Kelvin P Jordan, James Bailey, Joanne Protheroe, Faraz Mughal, Martin J Thomas, Anna Saxne Jöud, Sue Jowett, Kym I E Snell, Kate M Dunn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kayleigh J MasonPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom. k.mason@keele.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5419-0669
Kelvin P JordanPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4748-5335
James BaileyPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2566-3527
Joanne ProtheroePrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9608-1487
Faraz MughalPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5437-5962
Martin J ThomasPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4951-9925
Anna Saxne JöudEpidemiology for Health, Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7192-4911
Sue JowettDepartment of Applied Health Research, School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8936-3745
Kym I E SnellDepartment of Applied Health Research, School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9373-6591
Kate M DunnPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6202-2606

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR203281National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR300957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain in childhood is common, but there is an information gap on initial care seeking. Our aim was to determine trends and variations in the consultation prevalence and incidence of musculoskeletal pain, and most common sites of pain, in children and young people presenting to UK primary care.

methodsA national UK primary care database (CPRD Aurum) was used to determine annual prevalence and incidence of consultation for musculoskeletal pain in children and young people (aged 8–18 years) between 2005 and 2021. Incidence was defined as no musculoskeletal consultation in the previous 12 months. Rates were calculated per 10,000 registered population for each calendar year and by age, gender, and body site.

results1,175,641 children and young people (49% female; median age 12) consulted primary care for musculoskeletal pain. Annual consultation prevalence for musculoskeletal pain rose from 808/10,000 in 2005 to 980/10,000 in 2011, then remained stable to 2015 before falling slightly. Annual consultation rates were higher for younger and older females, although minimal differences were observed between genders for 12–15-year-olds. Foot/ankle was the most common pain site in younger children. Back pain was the most recorded pain site for females from age 16.

conclusionsThis study provides contemporary data on how common consultations for musculoskeletal pain are in children and young people using nationally representative primary care electronic health records. It demonstrates that musculoskeletal pain is common in children and young people with nearly one in ten seeking primary health care each year, with different patterns by age, gender and body site. Understanding the epidemiology of musculoskeletal pain in children and young people presenting to primary care is key due to paucity of information on how to effectively care for this population and highlights a need to ensure that service provision is adapted accordingly.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal PainPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationAdolescentChildElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansIncidenceMalePrevalenceUnited KingdomChildrenEpidemiologyMusculoskeletal painPediatricsPrimary health careYoung people

Identifiers

PMID41291535
PMCPMC12648837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.