ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Explaining higher functional disability in women compared to men among older adults - the Singapore Chinese Health Study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStudies suggest that the higher prevalence of functional disability in women could be explained by differences in social and health-related factors. We examined these factors in association with disability among Chinese older adults in Singapore.
methodsWe used data from 13,788 participants who attended the third follow-up interviews in the Singapore Chinese Health Study, when the mean age was 72.86 ± 6.23 years. Participants who had overall scores > 8 on the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Scale were considered to have functional disability. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association with functional disability.
resultsThe age-adjusted OR (95% CI) for the association with functional disability in women compared to men was 1.29 (1.20-1.39). However, after additional adjustment for other determinants of functional disability, this OR (95% CI) was attenuated to 0.96 (0.88-1.05). This association was largely mediated by lack of formal education (45.8%), weak handgrip strength (20.3%), arthritis (15.0%) and abdominal obesity (8.4%). Furthermore, age, lack of education, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, arthritis and abdominal obesity were associated with significantly higher odds of disability in women than in men (P-values of interactions with gender ≤ 0.042).
conclusionLower educational attainment, musculoskeletal conditions, and abdominal obesity may contribute to a higher likelihood of disability in women. Additionally, abdominal obesity, arthritis and cardiometabolic diseases showed stronger associations with functional disability in women than in men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.