ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Interpretable multimodal MRI radiomics for predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the value of multimodal MRI radiomics model in predicting Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response in Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and assess the performance differences between machine learning and deep learning models.
methods370 NPC patients were retrospectively enrolled, with 126 patients receiving additional Dynamic contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI). Radiomics features were extracted from T1WI, PDWI, CE-T1WI and DCE-MRI sequences. Feature selection was performed through Mutual Information Criterion (MIC), Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) algorithms, and feature selection network. Machine learning models based on logistic regression, support vector machines, random forests, and extreme gradient boosting, as well as deep learning prediction models of multi-layer perceptrons were established. Model performance was evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and interpreted through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values.
resultsThe deep learning model incorporating DCE-MRI features showed superior performance with an Area under the curve(AUC) of 0.885, sensitivity of 79.6%, and specificity of 83.7%. SHAP analysis revealed that DCE-MRI features, particularly from late enhancement phases, contributed most significantly to model predictions.
conclusionThe multimodal MRI radiomics model, especially when combined with DCE-MRI, can effectively predict NAC response in NPC patients. The model's interpretability through SHAP analysis demonstrates its potential for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.