ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Striving for purposeful autonomy: a qualitative method to enhance autonomy measurement in older adults.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intensive care admissions in older adults: are we moving from ageism to ableism?European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe global aging population faces challenges in preserving autonomy because of chronic disease and frailty, affecting quality of life and health outcomes. Current autonomy assessments focus on functional aspects but fail to capture the broader concept of autonomy in older adults, showing limited sensitivity in individuals with severe loss of autonomy. This study aimed to redefine autonomy among older adults, providing a foundation for future comprehensive assessment tools in geriatrics.
methodsThis qualitative study was conducted at a university hospital in Paris from June 2023 to February 2024. A focus group of geriatric healthcare professionals discussed autonomy assessment, with analysis by grounded theory. Four individual interviews with older patients and family caregivers were conducted at home, with analysis by interpretative phenomenological analysis. The integration of these perspectives led to comprehensive models for understanding and assessing autonomy loss in older adults.
resultsHealthcare professionals reported that the Katz ADL scale was insufficient for assessing autonomy in older adults and emphasized the need for more comprehensive tools. Patients and caregivers highlighted that autonomy was often preserved through compensatory strategies until external assistance became necessary, leading to diminished decision-making capacity and eventual institutionalization. The process of autonomy loss involved a decline in functional abilities, changes in self-perception and personality traits, and a redefinition of life purpose, all of which further exacerbated autonomy reduction. Caregivers were also identified as key experts in understanding the older adult's condition.
conclusionsTo effectively assess autonomy in older adults, the focus must be on life goals and insights from caregivers. Our future tool may address this gap in clinical practice by capturing these essential aspects, ultimately enhancing quality of life in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.