Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41291442›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2025

An artificial selection procedure enriches for known and suspected chitin degraders from the prokaryotic rare biosphere of multiple marine biotopes.

Laurence Meunier, Tina Keller-Costa, David Cannella, Jorge M S Gonçalves, Etienne Dechamps, Matilde Marques, Rodrigo Costa, Isabelle F George

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laurence MeunierLaboratory of Ecology of Aquatic Systems, Brussels Bioengineering School, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Tina Keller-CostaInstitute for Bioengineering and Biosciences (iBB) and Institute for Health and Bioeconomy (i4HB), Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
David CannellaPhotoBioCatalysis Unit, Crop Nutrition and Biostimulation Lab (CPBL) and Biomass Transformation Lab (BTL), Brussels Bioengineering School, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Jorge M S GonçalvesAlgarve Centre of Marine Sciences (CCMAR), Universidade Do Algarve (UALG), Faro, Portugal.
Etienne DechampsLaboratory of Ecology of Aquatic Systems, Brussels Bioengineering School, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Matilde MarquesInstitute for Bioengineering and Biosciences (iBB) and Institute for Health and Bioeconomy (i4HB), Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Rodrigo Costa *Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences (iBB) and Institute for Health and Bioeconomy (i4HB), Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal. rodrigocosta@tecnico.ulisboa.pt.
Isabelle F George *Laboratory of Ecology of Aquatic Systems, Brussels Bioengineering School, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium. Isabelle.George@ulb.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiological chitin degradation is a major process in the ocean, governed primarily by the action of microorganisms. It is known that the structure and taxonomic profile of chitin-degrading microbial communities change across marine biotopes, but efforts to isolate chitin degraders within these communities in the laboratory have seldom been attempted. We characterized the prokaryotic communities associated with the marine sponge Sarcotragus spinosulus, the octocoral Eunicella labiata, and their surrounding sediment and seawater and applied an artificial selection procedure to enrich bacterial consortia capable of degrading chitin from the abovementioned biotopes. Throughout the procedure, chitin degradation was monitored, and the taxonomic composition was studied along four successive enrichment cultures from each biotope.

resultsThe naturally occurring prokaryotic communities of the two host species (Sarcotragus spinosulus and Eunicella labiata) were distinct from each other and from those of seawater and sediments, even though they were co-inhabiting the same geographic area. We found that low-abundance bacteria from the rare biosphere were recruited in the enrichment cultures from all biotopes, while dominant bacterial symbionts likely to play a role in chitin degradation within marine sponges and octocorals remained "unculturable" under our experimental conditions. Well-known chitin degraders such as Vibrio, Pseudoalteromonas and Aquimarina, as well as other taxa not known or poorly known for their role(s) in chitin degradation such as Aureivirga, Halodesulfovibrio, Motilimonas, Muricauda, Psychromonas, Poseidonibacter, Reichenbachiella, and Thalassotalea, among others, were enriched using our artificial selection approach. Distinct chitin-degrading consortia were enriched from each marine biotope, highlighting the feasibility of this approach in fostering the discovery of novel microorganisms and enzymes involved in chitin degradation pathways of relevance in applied biotechnology.

conclusionThis study unveils distinct bacterial consortia possessing moderate to high efficiency at degrading chitin. They were composed of a mix of known chitin degraders, known chitin utilizers and many taxa poorly or not yet known for their role(s) in chitin degradation such as Aureivirga, Psychromonas, Motilimonas, Reichenbachiella, or Halodesulfovibrio. The latter taxa are potential key players in marine chitin degradation whose study could lead to the discovery of novel enzyme variants able to degrade chitin and its derivatives.

Indexed as

AnthozoaBacteriaChitinPoriferaSeawaterAnimalsDNA, BacterialGeologic SedimentsMicrobial ConsortiaPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SChitinDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SChitinaseEnrichment culturesMarine spongeOctocoralProkaryotic communitiesSize exclusion chromatography

Identifiers

PMID41291442
PMCPMC12648933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.