Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41291439›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2025

The interplay of salinity stress and nitrogen management on gas exchange in quinoa.

Fatemeh Alishahi, Rezvan Talebnejad, Ali Reza Sepaskhah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fatemeh AlishahiWater Engineering Department, Shiraz University, Shiraz, I. R. of Iran.
Rezvan TalebnejadWater Engineering Department, Shiraz University, Shiraz, I. R. of Iran. rtalebnejad@shirazu.ac.ir.
Ali Reza SepaskhahWater Engineering Department, Shiraz University, Shiraz, I. R. of Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the quinoa physiological responses to varying irrigation water salinity levels and nitrogen application rates. Over two years, a field experiment was conducted at Shiraz University in Iran using a Factorial Randomized Block Design with three replications to investigate the combined effects of irrigation water salinity levels (5, 10, 20, and 25 dS m⁻¹) and nitrogen rates (0, 150, and 300 kg N ha⁻¹). The study focused on key parameters, including gas exchange, leaf area index, leaf water potential, and root characteristics. The results indicated that the maximum leaf area index (LAImax) decreased by 25% in 25 dS m⁻¹ compared to 5 dS m⁻¹, with no significant differences between 5 and 10 dS m⁻¹. Photosynthesis rate (An) reduced by 20% and 23% at 20 and 25 dS m⁻¹, respectively, compared to 5 dS m⁻¹, with minimal differences between 5 and 10 dS m⁻¹ or 20 and 25 dS m⁻¹. It also increased by 20% in 150 kg N ha⁻¹ and 43% in 300 kg N ha⁻¹ compared to non-fertilized control. Stomatal conductance (gs) in 5 dS m⁻¹ increased by 25% and 100% by N application rate of 150 and 300 kg N ha⁻¹, respectively. The 300 kg N ha⁻¹ treatment improved gs under salinity levels (5, 10, 20, and 25 dS m⁻¹) by 100%, 136%, 64%, and 70%, respectively, compared to non-fertilized crop. Leaf transpiration rate was enhanced by 10% in 150 kg N ha⁻¹ and 38% in 300 kg N ha⁻¹ compared to non-fertilized treatments. Therefore, although salinity harmed gas exchange parameters, nitrogen application mitigated the negative effect and improved these parameters. Despite these improvements, the 300 kg N ha⁻¹ treatment reduced water-use efficiency (An/gs) due to disproportionately higher increases in gs and leaf transpiration (Tr) compared to An. Leaf water potential was stable in salinity levels of 5 and 10 dS m⁻¹ but decreased significantly by 9% and 12% in 20 and 25 dS m⁻¹, respectively. Our findings showed a significant reduction in root length and weight density (RLD and RWD, respectively) in salinity above 10 dS m⁻¹, with greater reductions in higher salinity levels. Generally, higher salinity levels reduced RLD and RWD; however, applying higher nitrogen rates mitigated this negative effect. For instance, in salinity level of 25 dS m⁻¹, RLD and RWD decreased by 68% and 22% in non-fertilized treatments, respectively, whereas in fertilized treatments, the reduction was only 50%.

Indexed as

Chenopodium quinoaNitrogenSalt StressAgricultural IrrigationPhotosynthesisPlant LeavesPlant RootsPlant StomataPlant TranspirationSalinityWaterNitrogenWaterIrrigation water salinityPhotosynthesis rateStomatal conductanceWater-use efficiency

Identifiers

PMID41291439
PMCPMC12751221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.