Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41291421›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2025

Entrustable Professional Activities for Emergency Medicine specialists.

David Teng, Anantharaman Venkataraman, Andrew Singer, Simon Chu, Arif Alper Cevik, Janis P Tupesis, Taj Hassan, James Kwan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David TengDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. david.kp.teng@nhghealth.com.sg.
Anantharaman VenkataramanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Andrew SingerAustralian Government Department of Health and Aged Care, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Simon ChuLyell McEwin Hospital, Elizabeth Vale, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Arif Alper CevikEmergency Medicine Section, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Janis P TupesisUniversity of Wisconsin, Wiscousin, USA.
Taj HassanLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
James KwanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVarious countries have developed competency frameworks for postgraduate training programs. Identifying Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) that are core clinical activities could bridge the gap between competencies and clinical practice. We aim to define core EPAs required for safe independent practice as an Emergency Medicine (EM) Specialist, aligned with curricular outcomes from the International Federation for Emergency Medicine (IFEM) model curriculum for postgraduate training and existing EPAs from IFEM member countries to demonstrate the value such core documents bring to training and practice.

methodsA nominal group of six members used consensus methodology to generate and rate essential EPAs for safe, independent practice as an EM specialist. Using existing literature on EPAs and IFEM curricular documents, the nominal group generated and clarified ideas for potential EPAs. Feedback was obtained from the IFEM Core Curriculum and Education committee, which comprises representatives from countries across all seven international regions, and integrated with iterative revisions. The EQual: Queen’s EPA Quality Rubric were used to rate how essential each EPA was for safe practice and the quality of each EPA. This approach is more rigorous as it allows for examination of the quality of EPAs generated and how well they align with the key domains of the EPA construct.

resultsA total of five core EPAs were selected and refined from seventeen proposed EPAs. The five EPAs were: EPA 1 (Patient resuscitation), EPA 2 (Adult and/or paediatric non-resuscitative emergency care), EPA 3 (Managing multiple emergency patients), EPA 4 (Maintaining quality emergency care), and EPA 5 (Teaching emergency staff). All core EPAs were directly mapped to the IFEM model curriculum to ensure relevancy and reliability. Rating with the EQual rubrics showed all five EPAs faring excellently, achieving overall median scores of more than four.

conclusionFive EPAs were identified and evaluated to show their importance as core EPAs required for safe, independent practice as an EM specialist. These EPAs can serve as a guide for individual countries to develop EPAs for training.

Indexed as

AssessmentCompetenceConsensus methodsEmergency medicineEntrustable professional activities

Identifiers

PMID41291421
PMCPMC12645698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.