Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41291329›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026

Hybrid parastomal endoscopic repair (HyPER): a retrospective case series of 200 patients treated over ten years at a single center.

Marek Szczepkowski, Mateusz Zamkowski, Bartosz Ziółkowski, Piotr Czyżewski, Piotr Witkowski, Maciej Śmietański

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marek SzczepkowskiClinical Department of Colorectal, General and Oncological Surgery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education in Warsaw, Bielanski Hospital, Warsaw, Poland.
Mateusz ZamkowskiDepartment of General Surgery and Hernia Center, Swissmed Hospital, Wileńska 44, 80-215, Gdańsk, Poland. sunzamek@wp.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-9847-4188
Bartosz ZiółkowskiClinical Department of Colorectal, General and Oncological Surgery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education in Warsaw, Bielanski Hospital, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr CzyżewskiFaculty of Rehabilitation, Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr WitkowskiClinical Department of Colorectal, General and Oncological Surgery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education in Warsaw, Bielanski Hospital, Warsaw, Poland.
Maciej ŚmietańskiII Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionParastomal hernia is a common and challenging complication after stoma formation, often requiring complex surgical management. To address limitations of conventional techniques, we developed the Hybrid Parastomal Endoscopic Repair (HyPER) technique, which combines laparoscopic and open approaches. This case series aimed to evaluate the long-term safety, efficacy, and technical considerations of the HyPER method in a large, consecutive cohort of patients.

methodsThis retrospective, single-center case series included 200 consecutive patients treated between 2014 and 2024. Adult patients with symptomatic or recurrent parastomal hernias were included; exclusion criteria were severe comorbidities precluding surgery or lack of follow-up data. Demographic and operative variables, perioperative outcomes, and recurrence rates were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used (mean, SD, range); no hypothesis testing was applied.

resultsThe majority of patients had EHS Type III or IV hernias. The mean operative time was 171 min. In 10% of cases, a cost-effective "Baldachin modification" using polypropylene mesh was employed. Stoma relocation was required in 87% of Type IV cases. Postoperative complications occurred in 12.5%, primarily wound infections. The recurrence rate was 5.5%, and quality of life significantly improved (VAS score increased from 3.15 to 9.15). No mortality was observed.

conclusionHyPER proved to be a safe and effective technique for treating parastomal hernias, especially in complex and recurrent cases. The approach allowed for thorough anatomical correction and yielded low recurrence rates with acceptable morbidity. The Baldachin modification may offer a viable low-cost alternative in resource-limited settings. Further multicenter studies are warranted to validate these findings and establish standardized protocols.

Indexed as

Hernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyIncisional HerniaLaparoscopySurgical StomasAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeRecurrenceAbdominal wall reconstructionCase seriesHernia surgeryHybrid parastomal endoscopic repairHyPERParastomal hernia

Identifiers

PMID41291329
PMCPMC12881038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.