ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Hybrid parastomal endoscopic repair (HyPER): a retrospective case series of 200 patients treated over ten years at a single center.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Robotic parastomal hernia repair with reinforced tissue matrix; lessons learned from our 74-patient cohort.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionParastomal hernia is a common and challenging complication after stoma formation, often requiring complex surgical management. To address limitations of conventional techniques, we developed the Hybrid Parastomal Endoscopic Repair (HyPER) technique, which combines laparoscopic and open approaches. This case series aimed to evaluate the long-term safety, efficacy, and technical considerations of the HyPER method in a large, consecutive cohort of patients.
methodsThis retrospective, single-center case series included 200 consecutive patients treated between 2014 and 2024. Adult patients with symptomatic or recurrent parastomal hernias were included; exclusion criteria were severe comorbidities precluding surgery or lack of follow-up data. Demographic and operative variables, perioperative outcomes, and recurrence rates were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used (mean, SD, range); no hypothesis testing was applied.
resultsThe majority of patients had EHS Type III or IV hernias. The mean operative time was 171 min. In 10% of cases, a cost-effective "Baldachin modification" using polypropylene mesh was employed. Stoma relocation was required in 87% of Type IV cases. Postoperative complications occurred in 12.5%, primarily wound infections. The recurrence rate was 5.5%, and quality of life significantly improved (VAS score increased from 3.15 to 9.15). No mortality was observed.
conclusionHyPER proved to be a safe and effective technique for treating parastomal hernias, especially in complex and recurrent cases. The approach allowed for thorough anatomical correction and yielded low recurrence rates with acceptable morbidity. The Baldachin modification may offer a viable low-cost alternative in resource-limited settings. Further multicenter studies are warranted to validate these findings and establish standardized protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.